AI Article Synopsis
- A study compared automated recordings and human observations of hand-hygiene events involving nearly 1,400 cases.
- There was a 38% discrepancy in details noted by the two methods.
- The differences were likely caused by factors such as the observer's distance from the event and the clinic's level of activity.
Article Abstract
We compared the observations of nearly 1,400 hand-hygiene-related events recorded by an automated system and by human observers. Observation details differed for 38% of these events. Two likely explanations for these inconsistencies were the distance between the observer and the event and the busyness of the clinic.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3632323 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/668426 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
precision human-generated
4
human-generated hand-hygiene
4
hand-hygiene observations
4
observations comparison
4
comparison human
4
human observation
4
observation automated
4
automated monitoring
4
monitoring system
4
system compared
4
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!