[Experimental study of osseointegration of nHA/BG coating and Bio-Oss in implant defects].

Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue

Department of Prosthodontics, Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China.

Published: August 2012

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess bone regeneration in defects around titanium implants coated with nanohydroxyapatite/bioactive glass (nHA/BG) in combination with Bio-Oss.
  • Four Beagle dogs had premolars extracted, and defects were created around implants with different treatment groups, followed by a histomorphometric analysis.
  • Results showed that while nHA/BG implants had better bone-integrated contact (BIC) at 8 and 16 weeks compared to mHA/Bio-Oss, the application of Bio-Oss did not hinder nHA/BG performance but helped stabilize newly formed bone.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate bone regeneration in defects at titanium implants with nHA/BG coating in conjunction with Bio-Oss.

Methods: Four mandibular premolars were extracted in 6 Beagle dogs. After 3 months, buccal dehiscence-type defects (2.25 mm×3 mm×4 mm) were surgically created following implant site. The three treatment modalities were randomly allocated: nHA/BG implant/Bio-Oss, nHA/BG implant/blood clot, and mHA implant/Bio-Oss. After 8 and 16 weeks, the dogs were sacrificed respectively. A histomorphometric analysis was performed. The data was analyzed with SPSS 13.0 software package for Student's t test and ANOVA.

Results: At 8- and 16-week, nHA/BG implant group revealed comparable mean BIC (30% to 18% versus 61% to 53%). However, mHA implant/Bio-Oss group revealed significantly lower mean BIC (21% versus 46%) values than nHA/BG implant/Bio-Oss group.A significant difference was observed for the mean BIC and RA values at 8-week between nHA/BG implant/Bio-Oss group and mHA implant/Bio-Oss group.

Conclusions: It is concluded that the application of Bio-Oss graft did not seem to interfere with the nHA/BG coating activity, but ensured a stabilization of the newly formed bone for defects.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nha/bg coating
12
nha/bg implant/bio-oss
12
mha implant/bio-oss
12
nha/bg
8
group revealed
8
implant/bio-oss group
8
implant/bio-oss
6
[experimental study
4
study osseointegration
4
osseointegration nha/bg
4

Similar Publications

[Experimental study of osseointegration of nHA/BG coating and Bio-Oss in implant defects].

Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue

August 2012

Department of Prosthodontics, Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China.

Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to assess bone regeneration in defects around titanium implants coated with nanohydroxyapatite/bioactive glass (nHA/BG) in combination with Bio-Oss.
  • Four Beagle dogs had premolars extracted, and defects were created around implants with different treatment groups, followed by a histomorphometric analysis.
  • Results showed that while nHA/BG implants had better bone-integrated contact (BIC) at 8 and 16 weeks compared to mHA/Bio-Oss, the application of Bio-Oss did not hinder nHA/BG performance but helped stabilize newly formed bone.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!