A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The effects of vaccination on serum hormone concentrations and conception rates in synchronized naive beef heifers. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study involved 59 crossbred beef heifers vaccinated with either a modified live virus (MLV) or inactivated virus vaccine during synchronization and breeding.
  • Heifers receiving the MLV vaccine exhibited lower pregnancy rates (48%) and a higher incidence of abnormal estrous cycles (38%) compared to those given the inactivated vaccine (one-dose: 86%, two-dose: 90%).
  • Overall, heifers vaccinated with the inactivated virus were more successful in achieving pregnancy, suggesting that MLV vaccination negatively impacts reproductive success in naïve heifers.

Article Abstract

Crossbred beef heifers (N = 59) were vaccinated at the time of synchronization/breeding with either a commercially available bovine herpesvirus type 1 modified live virus (MLV) (one dose) or inactivated virus vaccine (one or two doses). The estrus cycle was synchronized at vaccination and heifers were artificially inseminated 8 days (one dose) or 36 days (two dose) after initial vaccination. Pregnancy rates were greater for control heifers (90%; P = 0.02) and heifers given the inactivated virus vaccine (one dose: 86%; P = 0.08; or two: 90%; P < 0.01) than those given the MLV vaccine (48%). No control heifers experienced an abnormal estrous cycle, whereas only two (two dose; 2/21) and one (one dose; 1/7) heifers in the inactive virus groups had abnormal estrous cycles and were similar to control (P > 0.10). Heifers given the MLV vaccine had a greater (P = 0.02) percentage of abnormal estrous cycles (38%; 8/21) compared with the control and inactivated groups. Of the heifers with an abnormal estrous cycle, 100% of heifers given the inactivated vaccine (one or two dose) conceived at their return estrus, whereas only 38% of heifers given the MLV vaccine conceived at their return estrus (P > 0.10). During the synchronization period, concentrations of estrogen were greater (P < 0.01) in the control and the two-dose inactivated group compared with the MLV group. After AI, progesterone concentrations were greater (P < 0.01) in control heifers compared with the inactivated and MLV groups, but were similar (P ≥ 0.18) between the inactivated and MLV groups. Therefore, naïve heifers vaccinated with the inactivated vaccine were less likely to have an abnormal estrous cycle and had significantly higher pregnancy rates compared with heifers vaccinated with the MLV vaccine. In summary, vaccination of naïve heifers with an MLV vaccine at the start of a fixed-time AI protocol had a negative effect on pregnancy success.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.10.005DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mlv vaccine
20
abnormal estrous
20
heifers
15
heifers vaccinated
12
control heifers
12
estrous cycle
12
heifers mlv
12
mlv
9
vaccine
9
beef heifers
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!