A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

In vivo confocal microscopy in diagnosis of limbal stem cell deficiency. | LitMetric

In vivo confocal microscopy in diagnosis of limbal stem cell deficiency.

Am J Ophthalmol

Department of Medicine and Ageing Sciences, Ophthalmology Clinic, University, G. D'Annunzio, of Chieti and Pescara, Chieti, Italy.

Published: February 2013

Purpose: To correlate in vivo confocal microscopy and impression cytology features of the corneal surface epithelia in patients with clinical features of partial or total limbal stem cell deficiency and to examine the limbal morphology.

Design: Prospective case-control observational study.

Methods: Twenty eyes of 17 consecutive patients (mean age 53.9 ± 9.2 years) presenting with clinical suspect of limbal stem cell deficiency and 10 eyes of 10 healthy control subjects were enrolled. In vivo confocal microscopy and impression cytology (PAS, cytokeratin 12, and cytokeratin 19) staining were performed in the central cornea. The inter-examination agreement was determined. Confocal microscopy scans were obtained in all patients to assess microscopic structure of the corneoscleral limbus, in all quadrants.

Results: Confocal microscopy and impression cytology agreement in testing the diagnostic hypotheses was high (κ = 0.85). The 2 methods were concordant in 18 out of 20 examined eyes (90%), revealing the presence of just corneal epithelium in 7 cases, just conjunctival epithelium (total limbal stem cell deficiency) in 5 cases, and mixed epithelium in 6 cases (partial limbal stem cell deficiency). Confocal imaging of the limbus revealed normal palisades of Vogt structure and epithelial transition in the healthy eyes while demonstrating a variable degree of alterations, including loss of the limbal palisades and of the normal epithelial mosaic, cystic epithelial changes, and subepithelial fibrosis, in the eyes affected by partial or total limbal stem cell deficiency.

Conclusions: Confocal microscopy was useful for the noninvasive in vivo diagnosis of limbal stem cell deficiency, with a high degree of concordance with impression cytology, and to detect limbal alterations associated with partial or total conjunctivalization of the cornea.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2012.08.017DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

limbal stem
28
stem cell
28
confocal microscopy
24
cell deficiency
24
impression cytology
16
microscopy impression
12
partial total
12
total limbal
12
limbal
10
diagnosis limbal
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!