Objective: Blunt vs sharp expansion of the uterine incision at cesarean delivery has been investigated as a technique primarily to reduce intraoperative blood loss. The objective of this systematic review was to compare the effects of either intervention on maternal outcomes.
Study Design: A systematic review with metaanalyses that used the DerSimonian and Laird random effects model was performed. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 4), MEDLINE (1948-Apr 2012), EMBASE (1947-Apr 2012), and the reference lists/citation history of articles were searched. Only randomized controlled trials were included.
Results: Four trials (1731 patients) were evaluated. Data from one recently completed trial (535 patients) were not yet available. Metaanalyses revealed a trend towards reduced maternal blood loss with blunt expansion of the uterine incision that was statistically significant when measured by surgeon's estimation of volume lost, but not by comparison of pre- and postoperative hematocrit and hemoglobin levels or a requirement for blood transfusion. There was a trend towards fewer unintended extensions in the blunt group and no difference in the incidence of endometritis.
Conclusion: Blunt dissection of the uterine incision at cesarean delivery appears to be superior to sharp dissection in minimizing maternal blood loss. However, this conclusion could change when data from a new unpublished large trial are available.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.10.886 | DOI Listing |
Eur J Health Econ
January 2025
Department of Business Administration and Health Care Management, Faculty of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Introduction: Cesarean deliveries account for approximately one-third of all births in Germany, prompting ongoing discussions on cesarean section rates and their connection to medical staffing and birth volume. In Germany, the majority of departments integrate obstetric and gynecological care within a single department.
Methods: The analysis utilized quality reports from German hospitals spanning 2015 to 2019.
Urogynecology (Phila)
January 2025
Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA.
Importance: Modern data regarding the relationship between vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) and obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) are minimal with mixed results.
Objective: The aim of the study was to determine if VBAC is associated with an increased risk of OASIs.
Study Design: This was a retrospective cohort study of liveborn deliveries from 2018 to 2022 within a large, multihospital academic health system.
Cureus
December 2024
Department of Gynecology, Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ljubljana University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, SVN.
Although burns are an extremely rare injury during pregnancy, they place a significant additional burden on the body, which is physiologically adapted to pregnancy and therefore limited in its ability to respond effectively to stress. Due to the low incidence of burns during pregnancy, the existing literature is scarce. Case reports are mostly from third-world countries, and there are no official guidelines or recommendations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X
March 2025
Department of Gynaecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University/Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Guangdong, China.
Background: Physical activity during pregnancy is a positive behavior for improving pregnancy outcomes, yet the relationship between physical activity during pregnancy and labor is still debated.
Objective: This study aimed to test our hypothesis that a higher level of physical activity during pregnancy is associated with a shorter labor duration.
Study Design: This was a prospective cohort study of pregnant women with singleton pregnancies and no contraindications to physical activity during pregnancy.
Med Sci Monit
January 2025
Department of Anesthesiology, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
BACKGROUND Butorphanol, an opioid receptor agonist and antagonist, is widely used for post-cesarean section analgesia in the form of intravenous or intramuscular injection, but nasal sprays are less used. This study aimed to evaluate the analgesic effect of butorphanol nasal spray on uterine contraction pain after cesarean section and explore its effect on postpartum prolactin secretion. MATERIAL AND METHODS We randomly divided 120 patients scheduled for cesarean section into 3 groups (40 per group): intranasal saline (control), butorphanol intranasal (BI), and butorphanol pumped intravenously (BV).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!