Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of comprehension in an orthopedic trauma patient population regarding injury, surgery, and postoperative instructions and to determine if educational background is associated with inadequate comprehension.

Design: This involved a prospective observational cohort.

Setting: The study was conducted at an Academic Level 1 trauma center.

Patients: From April to June 2011, 248 orthopedic trauma patients with an operatively fixed isolated fracture were found to be eligible for inclusion. One hundred forty-six eligible questionnaires were collected (58.9% response rate).

Intervention: The patients were administered a questionnaire during their first postoperative visit before being seen by a physician. The questionnaire included demographic information and questions regarding (1) which bone was fractured; (2) the type of implanted fixation; (3) weight-bearing status; (4) expected recovery time; and (5) need for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to examine the association between educational level and questions regarding surgical procedure and discharge instructions.

Results: The overall mean score of all the patients on the patient comprehension portion was 2.54 ± 1.27 correct responses out of 5. Only 47.9% of patients knew the bone they fractured, and 18.5% knew their expected healing time. Of the patients, 66.4% knew the type of implanted fixation, and 45.2% knew their weight-bearing status. The patients (74.0%) knew their DVT prophylaxis medication(s). The mean score for patients in the group ≤ HS (high-school education or less) was 2.26, whereas the mean score for patients in the group > HS (more than high-school education) was 3.00 (P = 0.0009). The patients in the group > HS were 2.54 times more likely to know the bone they fractured (P = 0.01), 3.82 times more likely to know the recovery time (P = 0.004), and 2.79 times more likely to know their DVT prophylaxis medication(s) than patients in the group ≤ HS.

Conclusions: Orthopedic trauma patients demonstrated limited comprehension of their injuries, surgeries, and postoperative instructions. Patients with lower educational levels did significantly worse on the questionnaire than those with higher educational levels. The results of the study highlight a lack of comprehension within this patient population and suggest that an increased focus on patient communication by orthopedic providers may be necessary.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182793338DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

orthopedic trauma
16
patients group
16
patient population
12
patients
12
bone fractured
12
dvt prophylaxis
12
score patients
12
trauma patient
8
patient comprehension
8
postoperative instructions
8

Similar Publications

Background: An aging population in combination with more gentle and less stressful surgical procedures leads to an increased number of operations on older patients. This collectively raises novel challenges due to higher age heavily impacting treatment. A major problem, emerging in up to 50% of cases, is perioperative delirium.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: Fracture-related infection (FRI) is a serious complication following fracture fixation surgery. Current treatment of FRIs entails debridement and 6 weeks of intravenous (IV) antibiotics. Lab data and retrospective clinical studies support use of oral antibiotics, which are less expensive and may have fewer complications than IV antibiotics.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a well-established risk factor for postoperative complications. Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are a common orthopedic injury and often require open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). The rise of ORIF utilization warrants investigation into factors that may expose patients to postoperative complications following DRF ORIF.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The number of meniscal repairs being completed each year is increasing; however, the optimal, cost-effective postoperative assessment to determine the success or failure of a meniscal repair is not well known.

Purpose/hypothesis: The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the clinical examination testing that correlates with objective magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or second-look arthroscopy (SLA) findings to determine an optimal clinical workup for assessing postoperative meniscal repair healing. It was hypothesized that specific clinical tests would correlate with meniscal repairs that did not heal.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Medial meniscus ramp lesions (MMRLs) are commonly associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and may increase the risk of graft failure after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) if undiagnosed or left untreated. Although MMRLs have been extensively reported in adults, there are limited studies describing them in pediatric patients undergoing ACLR. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the pooled prevalence of and risk factors for MMRLs in pediatric patients with ACL injuries.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!