Purpose: Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) contribute to tumor progression through multiple pathways. However, the effect of CAFs on gene expression in lung cancer has been largely unknown. Here we systematically compared the gene expression changes in lung cancer cells induced by normal fibroblasts and CAFs.

Methods: Wound healing and cell proliferation assays were used to identify the property of CAFs used in this study. We used cDNA microarray analysis to compare gene expression in lung cancer cells cultured with either conditioned medium (CM) from lung CAFs or normal lung fibroblasts, the result of which was confirmed by RT-PCR and Western blot analysis. Immunohistochemistry on tissue sections from lung cancers was conducted to further confirm the results of cDNA microarray analysis.

Results: The expression of many genes was upregulated in cancer cells by CAF CM, particularly cell adhesion molecules, integrins, and anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2. Expression of integrins appeared to be upstream from Bcl-2. We identified transforming growth factor-β as a candidate factor that induced the expression of those genes in cancer cells. Immunohistochemical studies of clinical lung cancer tissues revealed that integrins and Bcl-2 were more highly expressed in the leading cells (LCs) than in the following cells, at the invasive front of cancer nests, which are adjacent to or in proximity to the stroma. Furthermore, the expression of integrins and Bcl-2 in LCs had a tendency to correlate with the clinical stage of cancer progression, including lymph node metastasis.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that CAFs promote lung cancer progression partly through the direct regulation of gene expression in the LCs of invasive cancer nests.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-012-1328-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lung cancer
24
gene expression
20
cancer cells
16
cancer
11
expression
9
lung
9
cancer-associated fibroblasts
8
regulation gene
8
leading cells
8
cells invasive
8

Similar Publications

Feasibility of detecting non-small cell lung cancer using exhaled breath condensate metabolomics.

J Breath Res

January 2025

School of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ocean University of China, 5 Yushan Rd, Qingdao, Shandong, 266003, CHINA.

Lung cancer is one of the most common malignancy in the world, and early detection of lung cancer remains a challenge. The exhaled breath condensate (EBC) from lung and trachea can be collected totally noninvasively. In this study, our aim is to identify differential metabolites between non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and control EBC samples and discriminate NSCLC group from control group by orthogonal projections to latent structures-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) models.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Substantial epidemiological evidence suggests a significant correlation between particulate matter 2.5 (PM) and lung cancer. However, the mechanism underlying this association needs to be further elucidated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A previous study classifies solid tumors based on collagen deposition and immune infiltration abundance, identifying a refractory subtype termed armored & cold tumors, characterized by elevated collagen deposition and diminished immune infiltration. Beyond its impact on immune infiltration, collagen deposition also influences tumor angiogenesis. This study systematically analyzes the association between immuno-collagenic subtypes and angiogenesis across diverse cancer types.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Breath analysis is increasingly recognized as a powerful noninvasive diagnostic technique, and a plethora of exhaled volatile biomarkers have been associated with various diseases. However, traditional analytical methodologies are not amenable to high-throughput diagnostic applications at the point of need. An optical spectroscopic technique, surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), mostly used in the research setting for liquid sample analysis, has recently been applied to breath-based diagnostics.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The increasing shift from cannabis smoking to cannabis vaping is largely driven by the perception that vaping to form an aerosol represents a safer alternative to smoking and is a form of consumption appealing to youth. Herein, we compared the chemical composition and receptor-mediated activity of cannabis smoke extract (CaSE) to cannabis vaping extract (CaVE) along with the biological response in human bronchial epithelial cells. Chemical analysis using HPLC and GC/MS revealed that cannabis vaping aerosol contained fewer toxicants than smoke; CaSE and CaVE contained teratogens, carcinogens, and respiratory toxicants.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!