A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Value of bilateral breast cancer for identification of rare recessive at-risk alleles: evidence for the role of homozygous GEN1 c.2515_2519delAAGTT mutation. | LitMetric

Virtually all known tumor predisposing genes have been identified via the analysis of familial cancer cases. Here we argue that this approach is likely to miss recessively acting cancer genes and suggest the analysis of family history-negative patients with multiple primary malignancies for identifying homozygous at-risk genotypes. We performed calculations showing that the homozygous carriers of rare recessive cancer predisposing alleles are unlikely to report a family history of the disease. We further revealed that the c.2515_2519delAAGTT homozygous mutation in a Holliday junction resolvase, GEN1, was overrepresented in women with bilateral breast cancer (BC) as compared to healthy controls [11/360 (3.1 %) vs. 18/1305 (1.4 %); odds ratio (OR) = 2.25 (1.02-4.75); p = 0.031], although this trend was not maintained in unilateral BC patients [23/1851 (1.2 %)]. Noticeably, presence of biallelic c.2515_2519delAAGTT mutation was associated with the absence of BC in mother both in bilateral and unilateral BC cases [7/239 (3.0 %) vs. 0/41 (0 %) and 21/1,558 (1.3 %) vs. 0/215 (0 %), respectively; Mantel-Haenszel p = 0.041]. Thus, this study suggests that identification of dominant and recessive cancer predisposing genes may require distinct study groups.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10689-012-9575-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bilateral breast
8
breast cancer
8
rare recessive
8
c2515_2519delaagtt mutation
8
predisposing genes
8
recessive cancer
8
cancer predisposing
8
cancer
6
cancer identification
4
identification rare
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!