Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcome and estimated cumulative survival rate of feldspathic porcelain veneers in situ for up to 21 years while also accounting for clustered outcomes.
Materials And Methods: Porcelain veneers(n = 499) placed in patients (n = 155) by a single prosthodontist between 1990 and 2010 were sequentially included, with 239 veneers (88 patients) placed before 2001 and 260 veneers (67 patients) placed thereafter. Nonvital teeth, molar teeth, or teeth with an unfavorable periodontal prognosis were excluded. Preparations had chamfer margins, incisal reduction, palatal overlap, and at least 80% enamel. Feldspathic veneers from refractory dies were etched (hydrofluoric acid), silanated, and bonded. Many patients received more than 1 veneer (mean: 5.8 ± 4.3). Clustered outcomes were accounted for by randomly selecting (random table) 1 veneer per patient for analysis. Clinical outcome (success, survival, unknown, dead, repair, failure) and Kaplan-Meier estimated cumulative survival were reported. Differences in survival were analyzed using the log-rank test.
Results: For the random sample of veneers (n = 155), the estimated cumulative survival rates were 96% ± 2% (10 years) and 96% ± 2% (20 years). For the entire sample, the survival rates were 96% ± 1% (10 years) and 91% ± 2% (20 years). Survival did not statistically differ between these groups (P = .65). Seventeen veneers in 8 patients failed, 75 veneers in 30 patients were classified as unknown, and 407 veneers in 130 patients survived. Multiple veneers in the same mouth experienced the same outcome, clustering the results.
Conclusions: Multiple dental prostheses in the same mouth are exposed to the same local and systemic factors, resulting in clustered outcomes. Clustered outcomes should be accounted for during analysis. When bonded to prepared enamel substrate, feldspathic porcelain veneers have excellent long-term survival with a low failure rate. The 21-year estimated cumulative survival for feldspathic porcelain veneers bonded to prepared enamel was 96% ± 2%.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Materials (Basel)
November 2024
Department of Biomaterials and Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, Brazil.
Restorative dentistry often uses ceramic laminate veneers for aesthetic anterior teeth restorations due to their natural appearance and minimal invasiveness. However, the understanding of their clinical performance and how ceramic microstructure and processing affect longevity is limited. This study aimed to address this gap by determining the mechanical behavior, fracture load, and failure modes of CAD-CAM processed laminate veneers made of either lithium-disilicate-based glass ceramic (IPS e.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Esthet Restor Dent
November 2024
Department of Prosthodontics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Objectives: To analyze survival and complication rates for anterior and premolar laminate-veneers out of different ceramic materials (feldspathic, leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic [LRGC], lithium-disilicate [LDS] and zirconia).
Material And Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across multiple databases for clinical studies on ceramic laminate-veneers with a minimum-follow-up of ≥ 1 year. The date of last search was on February 19, 2024.
This case report presents the conservative management of a malposed implant in the maxillary anterior region caused by craniofacial bone remodeling. The patient expressed dissatisfaction with the position and shade of an implant that was placed almost three decades previously. After evaluating different treatment options, the patient opted to replace the implant prosthesis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: The purpose of the current study was to investigate the shear bond strength of composite resin in five different ceramic repair systems for three different ceramic materials.
Materials And Methods: 225 monolithic zirconia (Zr) and lithium disilicate (LDS) and cobalt chromium (CoCr) specimens with feldspathic porcelain (FP) veneer were fabricated (N=75 per material). The specimens underwent thermo-cycling and were randomly divided into five groups for the following intra-oral repair systems (n=15): 1) Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus, Kuraray Noritake, Japan; 2) Ibond Intraoral Repair Kit, Kulzer, Germany; 3) VOCO Cimara, VOCO GmbH Germany; 4) Ivoclar Vivadent, Ceramic Repair System Kit, IvoclarVivadent, Liechtenstein; 5) Ultradent Porcelain Repair Kit, Ultradent Products Inc, USA.
BMC Oral Health
October 2024
Endodontist, Ordu Central Dental Hospital, Ordu, Turkey.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!