Waiting and weighting: Information sampling is a balance between efficiency and error-reduction.

Cognition

Cognitive Science Program & Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6.

Published: February 2013

The current study investigates the relative extent to which information utility and planning efficiency guide information-sampling strategies in a classification task. Prior research has pointed to the importance of probability gain, the degree to which sampling a feature reduces the chance of error, in contexts where participants are restricted to one sample. We monitored participants as they sampled information in an unrestricted context and recorded whether they began their search with a high gain feature or an efficient feature that ultimately allowed for fewer samples per trial. Participants preferred to sample the more efficient feature first, especially when feature information had a higher access cost (Experiment 1). When access costs were all but eliminated using eye-tracking (Experiment 2), participants' fixations still emphasized efficiency over high probability gain, though probability gain was shown to influence access patterns.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.014DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

probability gain
12
efficient feature
8
feature
5
waiting weighting
4
weighting sampling
4
sampling balance
4
balance efficiency
4
efficiency error-reduction
4
error-reduction current
4
current study
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!