Objectives: In the context of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation, oral anticoagulant therapy has been traditionally replaced by bridging with heparin during the periprocedural period. We wanted to study the feasibility and safety of continuous warfarin therapy compared to traditional bridging therapy.

Design: The complication rates were compared retrospectively in a consecutive patient series. In the bridging group, warfarin was discontinued three days and low molecular weight heparin started one day prior to the procedure. Warfarin was reinitiated one day after and low molecular weight heparin was continued until the therapeutic INR target was reached. Patients on continuous therapy received warfarin throughout the periprocedural period. All patients received unfractionated heparin during the procedure.

Results: Three thromboembolic cerebrovascular events (1.9%) occurred in the bridging group (n = 157) and seven (0.82%) in the warfarin group (n = 850) (p = 0.142). The number of cardiac tamponades was one (0.64%) and four (0.47%), respectively (p = 0.786). Total number of severe bleeding and thromboembolic complications was more common in the bridging group: 9 (5.7%) versus 22 (2.6%); p = 0.036. In multivariate analysis, female gender, advanced age, and bridging therapy predicted complications.

Conclusions: Continuous oral anticoagulant therapy is a safe and feasible alternative for bridging therapy in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14017431.2012.743674DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

catheter ablation
12
ablation atrial
12
atrial fibrillation
12
bridging group
12
continuous warfarin
8
warfarin therapy
8
therapy safe
8
safe feasible
8
oral anticoagulant
8
anticoagulant therapy
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!