Unlabelled: BACKGROUND/STUDY CONTEXT: This study examined the effects of stimulus-stimulus and response-response cross-task compatibility and aging on dual-task performance. Hypothesis 1 predicted that the response code compatibility effect in both experiments would benefit older adults comparably to younger adults. Hypothesis 2 predicted that stimulus-stimulus compatibility would be additive to the effects of cross-task compatibility.
Methods: Younger and older adults participated in two dual-task experiments. Experiment 1 utilized a cross-task compatibility design identical to that of Koch and Prinz ( 2002 , Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 192-201). Experiment 2 added a stimulus-stimulus compatibility condition.
Results: The results of both experiments supported Hypothesis 1. Older adults displayed comparable cross-task compatibility effects to younger adults. The data did not support Hypothesis 2. The response-response compatibility effect from Experiment 1 was replicated, but the effect of stimulus-stimulus compatibility was not significant.
Conclusion: The results of both experiments showed that older adults were able to take advantage of cross-task compatibility as a task design to improve dual-task performance. The lack of stimulus-stimulus compatibility effects in Experiment 2 suggested that the benefit of task design may be limited in effect.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2012.726154 | DOI Listing |
Acta Psychol (Amst)
October 2018
Department of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address:
Sequential modulation between two task congruencies has been examined to investigate the nature of the cognitive control mechanism underlying the congruency sequence effect (CSE). Previous results regarding what consecutive tasks must have in common to engender the cross-task CSE are inconsistent. The present study examined the roles of stimulus-response (S-R) mappings and response mode as critical factors in determining the scope of control.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFActa Psychol (Amst)
July 2018
Eberhard Karls- University of Tübingen, Department of Psychology, Germany.
In dual-task situations, which often involve some form of sequential task processing, features of Task 2 were shown to affect Task 1 performance, a phenomenon termed "backward crosstalk effect" (BCE). Most previous reports of BCEs are based on manipulations of code compatibility between tasks, while there is no clear picture whether and how mere Task 2 response selection difficulty (in the absence of cross-task dimensional code overlap, including effector system overlap) may also affect Task 1 performance. In the present study, we systematically manipulated response-response (R1-R2) relation (compatible, incompatible, arbitrary) and the stimulus-response (S-R) relation in Task 2 (S2-R2: compatible, incompatible, arbitrary; i.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Psychol
February 2016
Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva Geneva, Switzerland.
Differences between the cognitive processes involved in word reading and picture naming are well established (e.g., visual or lexico-semantic stages).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFExp Aging Res
March 2013
Department of Psychology, SUNY Plattsburgh, Plattsburgh, NY 12901, USA.
Unlabelled: BACKGROUND/STUDY CONTEXT: This study examined the effects of stimulus-stimulus and response-response cross-task compatibility and aging on dual-task performance. Hypothesis 1 predicted that the response code compatibility effect in both experiments would benefit older adults comparably to younger adults. Hypothesis 2 predicted that stimulus-stimulus compatibility would be additive to the effects of cross-task compatibility.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFActa Psychol (Amst)
September 2011
Institute of Psychology I, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Using a dual-task methodology we examined the interaction of perceiving and producing facial expressions. In one task, participants were asked to produce a smile or a frown (Task 2) in response to a tone stimulus. This auditory-facial task was embedded in a dual-task context, where the other task (Task 1) required a manual response to visual face stimuli (visual-manual task).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!