Background: Student pharmacist mentoring programs have gained attention from colleges of pharmacy as a way to enhance the student experience. However, no evaluative models have been proposed or theoretical explanations described for use in improving formal mentoring programs in pharmacy or for guiding the construction of a literature base.
Objectives: The objectives of this study were to investigate student expectations and preferences for formal mentoring programs and propose a model for evaluating formal mentoring programs in pharmacy education.
Methods: Five, 60-minute focus groups were conducted in September 2009. Participants were PharmD candidates in their first 3 years of professional education. Discussion was facilitated using a question guide. Following transcription, an initial iteration of the model was used to code the data. A consensus-forming process was used to derive themes and identify representative quotes. Elaboration and specification of the final proposed model is presented.
Results: In all, 28 students participated. Emergent constructs were identified from the data. Structures or inputs of the formal mentoring program included mentor and protégé characteristics and program structure. Mentoring processes included mentor functions, mentoring activities, and relationship development. Outcomes included both proximal outcomes in the form of mentor and protégé change, program satisfaction, and organizational learning; and distal outcomes comprised mentor, protégé, and organizational outcomes.
Conclusions: This formal mentoring evaluation model was useful in guiding analysis of protégé experiences and preferences for a college-sponsored program. The model can be used to guide college administrators and researchers on future theory-based inquiry into protégé; mentor; and organizational structures, processes, and outcomes for formal mentoring programs.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2012.08.003 | DOI Listing |
Cureus
November 2024
Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raebareli, Raebareli, IND.
Networking is a critical component of professional development in medical education, involving the establishment and maintenance of relationships that facilitate the exchange of information, resources, and opportunities. Defined as the process of creating and nurturing connections with peers, mentors, and collaborators, networking is essential for advancing research, enhancing career development, and improving clinical practice. This review explores the multifaceted role of networking in academia, emphasizing its importance for medical professionals who rely on collaborative efforts to drive innovation and improve patient care.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Womens Health (Larchmt)
December 2024
Department of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Although women have comprised at least 50% of medical school classes for decades, women remain underrepresented in leadership positions. Although the proportion of women division chiefs in the U.S.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGenet Med Open
July 2024
Genomics and Inherited Disease Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research and University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Purpose: In Australia and New Zealand, one third of genetic counselors have less than 5 years' experience. Sharing experienced practitioners' professional knowledge is needed as the profession grows. Formal mentoring is an important facilitator of career progression and shared knowledge.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMusculoskeletal Care
December 2024
School of Medicine, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Objectives: To explore physiotherapists' experiences and perceived acceptability of delivering a bracing intervention for knee osteoarthritis (OA) in the 'PROvision of braces for Patients with knee OA' (PROP OA) randomised controlled trial.
Method: Semi-structured telephone interviews with consenting physiotherapists who received the PROP OA training programme and delivered the knee bracing intervention (advice, information and exercise instruction plus knee brace matched to patients' clinical and radiographic presentation and with adherence support). Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim.
Background: In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), laparoscopic surgery is challenging to implement due to limited resources and lack of expert surgeons as teachers. The Global Laparoscopic Advancement Program (GLAP) was developed by the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) to deliver sustainable and effective methods for teaching safe laparoscopic surgery. GLAP aims to train surgical leaders and trainees with the goal of eventual in-country replication of GLAP programming.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!