A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Impact of the CXCR4 structure on docking-based virtual screening of HIV entry inhibitors. | LitMetric

Impact of the CXCR4 structure on docking-based virtual screening of HIV entry inhibitors.

J Mol Graph Model

Grup d'Enginyeria Molecular, Institut Químic de Sarriá-IQS, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain.

Published: September 2012

Herein we analyze in depth the receptor-based virtual screening (VS) performance of the five recent crystallized CXCR4 structures along with a CXCR4 rhodopsin-based homology model. All CXCR4 Protein Data Bank (PDB) structures are co-crystallized with a small organic antagonist except structure 3OE0, which is co-crystallized with a cyclic peptide analog. Evaluation of the CXCR4 models was done by retrospective docking-based VS using a test set of 248 known CXCR4 inhibitors from 4 different chemotype families and 4696 different presumed inactives. The performance of the docking protocol using the five different protein structures was assessed in terms of pose prediction and hits detection using 12 different docking scoring functions and a scoring function with rescoring. Results show that 3OE6 structure achieves the highest docking-based performance with an average area under the curve (aAUC) of 0.84 and an average enrichment factor (aEF) of 11.7 at 1% of decoys screened. CXCR4 rhodopsin-like homology model performs comparable to the crystallized structures in the 1% of database screened. Moreover, a detailed analysis of the retrospective docking results using the CXCR4 homology model in Discovery Studio allows us to hypothesize the existence of multiple binding sub-sites in CXCR4 binding pocket.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmgm.2012.06.010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

homology model
12
virtual screening
8
cxcr4
8
impact cxcr4
4
cxcr4 structure
4
structure docking-based
4
docking-based virtual
4
screening hiv
4
hiv entry
4
entry inhibitors
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!