AI Article Synopsis

  • The text discusses the limited knowledge about vancomycin-resistant (VR) Enterococcus faecalis compared to VR Enterococcus faecium and highlights the greater risk of vancomycin resistance transfer to Staphylococcus aureus from E. faecalis.
  • A retrospective study at the Detroit Medical Center identified and analyzed 532 cases of VR E. faecalis and their risk factors, including age, diabetes, and recent antibiotic exposure.
  • The findings suggest that controlling VR E. faecalis, and preventing the emergence of vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA), requires focused regional efforts on infection control and careful antibiotic use.

Article Abstract

Although much is known about vancomycin-resistant (VR) Enterococcus faecium, little is known about the epidemiology of VR Enterococcus faecalis. The predilection of VR E. faecalis to transfer the vancomycin resistance determinant to Staphylococcus aureus is much greater than that of VR E. faecium. The epidemiology of VR E. faecalis has important implications regarding the emergence of vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA); 8 of 13 reported VRSA cases have been from Michigan. A retrospective case-case-control study was conducted at the Detroit Medical Center, located in southeastern Michigan. Unique patients with VR E. faecalis infection were matched to patients with strains of vancomycin-susceptible (VS) E. faecalis and to uninfected controls at a 1:1:1 ratio. Five hundred thirty-two VR E. faecalis cases were identified and were matched to 532 VS E. faecalis cases and 532 uninfected controls. The overall mean age of the study cohort (n = 1,596) was 63.0 ± 17.4 years, and 747 (46.8%) individuals were male. Independent predictors for the isolation of VR E. faecalis (but not VS E. faecalis) compared to uninfected controls were an age of ≥65 years, nonhome residence, diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, exposure to cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones in the prior 3 months, and immunosuppressive status. Invasive procedures and/or surgery, chronic skin ulcers, and indwelling devices were risk factors for both VR E. faecalis and VS E. faecalis isolation. Cephalosporin and fluoroquinolone exposures were unique, independent predictors for isolation of VR E. faecalis. A majority of case patients had VR E. faecalis present at the time of admission. Control of VR E. faecalis, and ultimately VRSA, will likely require regional efforts focusing on infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3535915PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01271-12DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

faecalis
15
uninfected controls
12
vancomycin-resistant enterococcus
8
enterococcus faecalis
8
case-case-control study
8
faecium epidemiology
8
patients faecalis
8
faecalis cases
8
controls age
8
independent predictors
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!