Purpose: This study evaluated the effects of either famotidine or antacid on the pharmacokinetics of nilotinib in healthy subjects, with the specific focus to explore different dosing separation schemes leading to a minimized drug-drug interaction.
Methods: Fifty-two subjects were randomized to receive the following treatments in a crossover manner: (A) single oral nilotinib 400 mg alone; (B) famotidine 20 mg twice a day for 3 days, followed by a single administration of nilotinib 400 mg and famotidine 20 mg on Day 4, where famotidine was given 2 h after nilotinib; (C) single oral nilotinib 400 mg and antacid suspension 20 mL, where antacid was given 2 h before nilotinib; (D) single oral nilotinib 400 mg and antacid suspension 20 mL, where antacid was given 2 h after nilotinib.
Results: Comparing Treatment B to Treatment A, the geometric mean ratios of nilotinib C(max), AUC(0-tlast), and AUC(0-inf) were 0.966, 0.984, and 0.911, respectively (90% confidence intervals (CIs), 0.875-1.066, 0.905-1.069, and 0.798-1.039, respectively). Nilotinib pharmacokinetic parameters following Treatment C or Treatment D were similar to those after Treatment A; the corresponding 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios of C(max), AUC(0-tlast), and AUC(0-inf) all fell within the bioequivalence range of 0.8-1.25.
Conclusions: Neither famotidine nor antacid significantly affected nilotinib pharmacokinetics. When concurrent use of an H2 blocker or an antacid is necessary, the H2 blocker may be administered 10 h before and 2 h after nilotinib dose, or the antacid may be administered 2 h before or 2 h after nilotinib dose.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-012-1999-3 | DOI Listing |
Br J Clin Pharmacol
December 2024
Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Aims: This study aims to evaluate the exposure-efficacy relationship of nilotinib and longitudinal BCR::ABL1 levels in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukaemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) and those who are imatinib-resistant or intolerant using a semimechanistic disease model.
Methods: The analysis included 489 CML-CP patients from 3 nilotinib trials (NCT00109707; NCT00471497; NCT01043874) with duration of follow-up ranging from 2 to 9 years. The semimechanistic disease model of CML-CP consisted of quiescent leukaemic stem cells, proliferating drug-susceptible and -resistant bone marrow cells.
J Hematol Oncol
December 2024
Georgia Cancer Center, Augusta, GA, USA.
Background: Up to 65% of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who are treated with imatinib do not achieve sustained deep molecular response, which is required to attempt treatment-free remission. Asciminib is the only approved BCR::ABL1 inhibitor that Specifically Targets the ABL Myristoyl Pocket. This unique mechanism of action allows asciminib to be combined with adenosine triphosphate-competitive tyrosine kinase inhibitors to prevent resistance and enhance efficacy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci
October 2024
Department of Pharmacy, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430030, China. Electronic address:
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and triazole antifungals are the first-line drugs for treating chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and fungal infections, respectively, but both suffer from large exposure differences and narrow therapeutic windows. Moreover, these two types of drugs are commonly used together in CML patients with fungal infections. Multiple studies and guidelines have suggested the importance of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of TKIs and triazoles.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTransl Cancer Res
July 2024
Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have become the preferred drugs for the treatment of chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of different TKIs as first-line treatments for CML using network meta-analysis (NMA), providing a basis for the precise clinical use of TKIs.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Databases (VIP), SinoMed and ClinicalTrials.
Toxicol Lett
October 2024
Department of Pharmaceutical Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey. Electronic address:
New generation BCR-ABL1 TKIs raised attention regarding their adverse effects, including hepatotoxicity. Indeed, bosutinib and nilotinib were associated with severe hepatotoxicity compared with imatinib. Moreover, ponatinib has a boxed warning due to its potential to cause inflammatory liver damage, even death.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!