Setting-level influences on implementation of the responsive classroom approach.

Prev Sci

Department of Psychology in Education, School of Education, University of Pittsburgh, 5937 Wesley W. Posvar Hall, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.

Published: February 2013

We used mixed methods to examine the association between setting-level factors and observed implementation of a social and emotional learning intervention (Responsive Classroom® approach; RC). In study 1 (N = 33 3rd grade teachers after the first year of RC implementation), we identified relevant setting-level factors and uncovered the mechanisms through which they related to implementation. In study 2 (N = 50 4th grade teachers after the second year of RC implementation), we validated our most salient Study 1 finding across multiple informants. Findings suggested that teachers perceived setting-level factors, particularly principal buy-in to the intervention and individualized coaching, as influential to their degree of implementation. Further, we found that intervention coaches' perspectives of principal buy-in were more related to implementation than principals' or teachers' perspectives. Findings extend the application of setting theory to the field of implementation science and suggest that interventionists may want to consider particular accounts of school setting factors before determining the likelihood of schools achieving high levels of implementation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11121-012-0294-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

setting-level factors
12
implementation
9
grade teachers
8
year implementation
8
principal buy-in
8
setting-level
4
setting-level influences
4
influences implementation
4
implementation responsive
4
responsive classroom
4

Similar Publications

Objectives: To delineate the key factors associated with treatment success or failure for patients undergoing lower extremity osteotomies to address a spectrum of lower extremity joint and limb deformities at an Integrated Limb Preservation Center (ILPC).

Methods: Retrospective cohort study. Level I Academic Trauma Center.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To evaluate implementation of a patient decision aid for symptomatic uterine fibroid management to improve shared decision-making at five clinical settings across the United States.

Methods: We used a type 3 hybrid effectiveness-implementation stepped-wedge design and the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) planning and evaluation framework. We conducted clinician training, monthly reach tracking with feedback to site clinical leads, patient and clinician surveys, and visit audio-recordings.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To identify risk factors for developing a fracture-related infection in operatively treated ballistic tibia fractures and to report the microbiologic results of intraoperative cultures.

Design: Retrospective review.

Setting: Level 1 trauma center.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Design: Retrospective study.

Setting: Level I academic Trauma Center.

Patient Selection Criteria: Adult patients with femoral shaft fractures in which a bilateral computed-tomography (CT) scan of both femurs was performed, with a two years minimal follow-up.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To report opioid prescription patterns after pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and identify if the implementation of the opioid prescribing guidelines (OPGs) modified these patterns.

Design: A retrospective chart review.

Setting: Level 1 Pediatric Trauma Center.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!