Fulvestrant fIRst-line Study comparing endocrine Treatments is a phase II, randomized, open-label study comparing fulvestrant 500 mg with anastrozole 1 mg as first-line endocrine therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) advanced breast cancer. At data cut-off, only 36 % of patients had progressed and the median time to progression (TTP) had not been reached for fulvestrant. Here, we report follow-up data for TTP for fulvestrant 500 mg versus anastrozole 1 mg. Key inclusion criteria were postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive and/or progesterone receptor-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer and no prior endocrine therapy. Key exclusion criteria were presence of life-threatening metastases and prior treatment with a non-approved drug. Fulvestrant was administered 500 mg/month plus 500 mg on day 14 of month 1; anastrozole was administered 1 mg/day. TTP was defined by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.0 before data cut-off for the primary analysis, and investigator opinion after data cut-off. Best overall response to subsequent therapy and serious adverse events are also reported. In total, 205 patients received fulvestrant 500 mg (n = 102) or anastrozole (n = 103). Follow-up analysis was performed when 79.5 % of patients had discontinued study treatment. Median TTP was 23.4 months for fulvestrant versus 13.1 months for anastrozole; a 34 % reduction in risk of progression (hazard ratio 0.66; 95 % confidence interval: 0.47, 0.92; P = 0.01). Best overall response to subsequent therapy and clinical benefit rate for subsequent endocrine therapy was similar between the treatment groups. No new safety concerns for fulvestrant 500 mg were documented. These longer-term, follow-up results confirm efficacy benefit for fulvestrant 500 mg versus anastrozole as first-line endocrine therapy for HR+ advanced breast cancer in terms of TTP, and, importantly, show similar best overall response rates to subsequent endocrine therapy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2192-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fulvestrant 500
24
endocrine therapy
20
breast cancer
16
500 versus
12
versus anastrozole
12
anastrozole first-line
12
advanced breast
12
data cut-off
12
best response
12
fulvestrant
10

Similar Publications

Background: Alpelisib, a PI3Kα-selective inhibitor and degrader, plus fulvestrant showed efficacy in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, PIK3CA-mutated advanced breast cancer in SOLAR-1; limited data are available in the post-cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor setting. BYLieve aimed to assess alpelisib plus endocrine therapy in this setting in three cohorts defined by immediate previous treatment; here, we report results from cohort A.

Methods: This ongoing, phase 2, multicentre, open-label, non-comparative study enrolled patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer with tumour PIK3CA mutation, following progression on or after previous therapy, including CDK4/6 inhibitors, from 114 study locations (cancer centres, medical centres, university hospitals, and hospitals) in 18 countries worldwide.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The patient was a 60-year-old woman. She was diagnosed with hypertension, symptomatic epilepsy, renal failure, and cerebral infarction. During follow-up, she was found to have a mass in her left breast and was referred to our department.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Inhibition of the cyclin D-cyclin dependent kinase (CDK)4/6-INK4-retinoblastoma pathway can overcome acquired or de novo treatment resistance to endocrine monotherapy. Responses to endocrine monotherapy in advanced endometrial cancer (EC) are suboptimal, perhaps due to genomic alterations that promote estrogen receptor (ER)-independent cyclin D1-CDK4/6 activation. We hypothesized that addition of abemaciclib, a CDK4/6 kinase inhibitor, to antiestrogen therapy with fulvestrant will be an effective therapeutic strategy in patients with advanced or recurrent EC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The SERENA-2 trial investigates the efficacy of camizestrant, a new oral selective estrogen receptor degrader, compared to the traditional injectable SERD, fulvestrant, in treating advanced hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in post-menopausal women.
  • This phase 2 trial includes patients who have experienced disease progression after previous endocrine therapies and assesses different dosages of camizestrant against fulvestrant, focusing on progression-free survival rates as the primary outcome.
  • Conducted across 74 centers worldwide, the study also monitors the safety and side effects of the treatments among all participants who received at least one dose.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - The MONARCH plus study found that adding abemaciclib to endocrine therapy significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) in postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer.
  • - In the study, cohort A (no prior systemic therapy) showed a median PFS of 28.27 months for abemaciclib users compared to 14.73 months for those on placebo, while cohort B (progression on prior therapy) showed 11.41 months vs. 5.59 months, respectively.
  • - Although abemaciclib was associated with some adverse events, they were manageable, and it demonstrated a trend toward overall survival (OS
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!