Two-piece impression procedure for implant-retained orbital prostheses.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants

Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey.

Published: June 2013

Obtaining an accurate impression of facial tissues with undercuts and extraoral implants has always been a challenge for both clinicians and patients. This report describes a three-step, two-piece technique that enables an accurate and comfortable impression of undercut tissues and extraoral implants in an orbital defect. An impression of the basal tissue surface of the defect area was made using a medium-body polyether impression material followed by an impression of the entire face of the patient made with a polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) impression material. First, the PVS impression material was removed; second, the impression posts were removed from the magnets; and third, the polyether impression was removed from the defect. The impression posts were attached to the implant analogs and placed in the negative spaces in the polyether impression. The polyether impression, which carries the implant analogs and impression posts, was placed in the PVS impression through the negative spaces. This technique minimizes trauma to the soft tissues and implants during impression making and also does not require additional materials.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

polyether impression
16
impression
15
impression material
12
pvs impression
12
impression posts
12
extraoral implants
8
defect impression
8
implant analogs
8
negative spaces
8
two-piece impression
4

Similar Publications

Background: Ultraviolet C (UVC) light is a physical method proposed for disinfecting dental impression materials and preventing cross-infections in clinical practice. The investigations have focused on the UVC disinfection potential, but little is known about the consequences on dental materials' properties. This scoping review's objective is to evaluate information about the effect of UVC light on the dimensional stability of dental impression materials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: With the current surge into digital dentistry, several options are available for clinicians, for example, when providing indirect restorations. There is a need for evidence on the quality of fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) fabricated using either digital or conventional impressions. This study aimed to evaluate the marginal fit of single-crown and three-unit FDP frameworks fabricated from digital and conventional impressions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The review examines how different methods for creating removable partial dentures (RPDs), both traditional and digital, impact the accuracy of fit and precision.
  • A thorough analysis of literature identified 8 key studies, revealing that fabrication techniques like resin milling and selective laser melting produce varying levels of fit accuracy, with resin milling using PEEK being the most precise.
  • Common assessment methods include silicone-based evaluations and digital superimposition, which are effective for measuring how well RPDs fit after fabrication.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To investigate dimensional accuracy of polyether (PE) and vinylpolysiloxane (VPS) impressions taken with manually fabricated and 3D-printed trays.

Materials And Methods: To evaluate impression accuracy, highly precise digital data of a metallic lower jaw model with prepared teeth (regions 34 and 36), an implant (region 47) and three precision balls placed occlusally along the dental arch served as reference. PE (Impregum, 3M Oral Care) and VPS (Aquasil, Dentsply Sirona) impressions (n = 10/group) were taken with trays fabricated using different materials and manufacturing techniques (FDM: filament deposition modeling, material: Arfona Tray, Arfona; printer: Pro2, Raise3D; DLP: digital light processing, material: V-Print Tray, VOCO, printer: Max, Asiga; MPR: manual processing with light-curing plates, material: LC Tray, Müller-Omicron) including an open implant impression.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To evaluate the distortion probability in impressions of completely dentate arches when different impression materials are used in relation to operator experience.

Materials And Methods: A total of 28 students (Group A) and 7 dentists (Group B) performed three maxillary impressions on 28 participants, each using vinyl siloxane ether (VSE), polyether (PE), and irreversible hydrocolloid (IHC). Gypsum master casts were fabricated and subsequently digitized.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!