Purpose: PET/MR hybrid scanners have recently been introduced, but not yet validated. The aim of this study was to compare the PET components of a PET/CT hybrid system and of a simultaneous whole-body PET/MR hybrid system with regard to reproducibility of lesion detection and quantitation of tracer uptake.
Methods: A total of 46 patients underwent a whole-body PET/CT scan 1 h after injection and an average of 88 min later a second scan using a hybrid PET/MR system. The radioactive tracers used were (18)F-deoxyglucose (FDG), (18)F-ethylcholine (FEC) and (68)Ga-DOTATATE (Ga-DOTATATE). The PET images from PET/CT (PET(CT)) and from PET/MR (PET(MR)) were analysed for tracer-positive lesions. Regional tracer uptake in these foci was quantified using volumes of interest, and maximal and average standardized uptake values (SUV(max) and SUV(avg), respectively) were calculated.
Results: Of the 46 patients, 43 were eligible for comparison and statistical analysis. All lesions except one identified by PET(CT) were identified by PET(MR) (99.2 %). In 38 patients (88.4 %), the same number of foci were identified by PET(CT) and by PET(MR). In four patients, more lesions were identified by PET(MR) than by PET(CT), in one patient PET(CT) revealed an additional focus compared to PET(MR). The mean SUV(max) and SUV(avg) of all lesions determined by PET(MR) were by 21 % and 11 % lower, respectively, than the values determined by PET(CT) (p < 0.05), and a strong correlation between these variables was identified (Spearman rho 0.835; p < 0.01).
Conclusion: PET/MR showed equivalent performance in terms of qualitative lesion detection to PET/CT. The differences demonstrated in quantitation of tracer uptake between PET(CT) and PET(MR) were minor, but statistically significant. Nevertheless, a more detailed study of the quantitative accuracy of PET(MR) and the factors governing it is needed to ultimately assess its accuracy in measuring tissue tracer concentrations.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-012-2249-y | DOI Listing |
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
January 2025
Huashan Hospital and Human Phenome Institute, Fudan University, 220 Handan Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Objective: This study aims to conduct a bibliometric analysis to explore research trends, collaboration patterns, and emerging themes in the PET/MR field based on published literature from 2010 to 2024.
Methods: A detailed literature search was performed using the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database with keywords related to PET/MR. A total of 4,349 publications were retrieved and analyzed using various bibliometric tools, including VOSviewer and CiteSpace.
Med Phys
November 2024
High-Field and Hybrid MR Imaging, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Quant Imaging Med Surg
November 2024
Radiology Unit, Alcorcon Foundation University Hospital, Alcorcon, Madrid, Spain.
Background: The hybrid imaging positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance (PET/MR) is an important tool in the management of pediatric oncology patients, particularly in malignant musculoskeletal pathologies, because it combines the functional and metabolic information of tumor provided by PET with the high soft-tissue contrast and the functional information offered by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Methods: We performed an observational retrospective study that included pediatric patients diagnosed with primary bone or soft-tissue sarcomas in the Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Unit at the HM Montepríncipe University Hospital, Boadilla del Monte, Madrid (Spain) who underwent whole-body F-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) PET/MRI as a staging study and for follow-up evaluation for treatment response from September 2017 to January 2023. This study explores the protocols, the practical application of the PET/MRI technique and our clinical experience at our center in the diagnosis and follow-up of primary bone tumors and soft-tissue sarcomas in children.
EJNMMI Rep
November 2024
Department of Radiology, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Background: Positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MR) is a cutting-edge hybrid imaging technology with the potential to revolutionize medical diagnosis. This bibliometric study aims to map the research landscape of PET/MR by analyzing a curated set of Web of Science Core Collection documents from 2011 to 2023.
Methods: We conducted a bibliometric analysis to map the research landscape of PET/MR, leveraging a curated dataset of 3,600 documents retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection spanning the period from 2011 to 2023.
Phys Med Biol
October 2024
School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, Department of Biomedical Engineering, St. Thomas' Hospital, Lambeth Road Palace, London, SE1 7EH, UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND.
In preclinical research, in vivo imaging of mice and rats is more common than any other animal species, since their physiopathology is very well- known and many genetically altered disease models exist. Animal studies based on small rodents are usually performed using dedicated preclinical imaging systems with high spatial resolution. For studies that require animal models such as mini- pigs or New-Zealand White (NZW) rabbits, imaging systems with larger bore sizes are required.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!