Background: Ranolazine exhibits a synergistic effect in combination with class III drugs to suppress atrial fibrillation.
Objective: To investigate whether a combination therapy affects repolarization and provokes ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VT) in a sensitive model of proarrhythmia.
Methods: Thirty-seven rabbits were assigned to 3 groups and fed with amiodarone (50 mg/kg/d; n = 10) or dronedarone (50 mg/kg/d; n = 10) over a period of 6 weeks. A third group was used as control (n = 17). After obtaining baseline data in Langendorff-perfused control hearts, sotalol (100 μM) was administered in this group. Thereafter, ranolazine (10 μM) was additionally infused on top of amiodarone, dronedarone, or sotalol.
Results: Chronic treatment with amiodarone or dronedarone as well as sotalol significantly increased action potential duration at 90% repolarization (APD(90)). Additional treatment with ranolazine further increased APD(90) in amiodarone- and dronedarone-pretreated hearts but not in sotalol-treated hearts. Ranolazine increased postrepolarization refractoriness as compared with amiodarone or dronedarone alone owing to a marked effect on the refractory period. In contrast to amiodarone and dronedarone, acute application of sotalol increased dispersion of repolarization (P < .05). Additional treatment with ranolazine did not further increase spatial or temporal dispersion. After lowering extracellular [K(+)] in bradycardic hearts, no proarrhythmia occurred in amiodarone- or dronedarone-treated hearts whereas 11 of 17 sotalol-treated hearts showed early afterdepolarizations and subsequent polymorphic VT. Additional treatment with ranolazine reduced the number of VT episodes in sotalol-treated hearts and did not cause proarrhythmia in combination with amiodarone or dronedarone.
Conclusions: Application of ranolazine on top of class III drugs does not cause proarrhythmia despite a marked effect on ventricular repolarization. The effect of ranolazine on the repolarization reserve is associated with the lack of effect on early afterdepolarizations and dispersion of repolarization.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.08.029 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Adverse drug reaction signals mining comparison of amiodarone and dronedarone: a pharmacovigilance study based on FAERS.
Front Pharmacol
October 2024
Department of Cardiology, Intervention Cardiology Center, Wuhan No. 1 Hospital, Wuhan, China.
Background: Amiodarone and dronedarone are both class III antiarrhythmic medications used to treat arrhythmias. The objective of this study was to enhance the current understanding of adverse drug reaction (ADR) associated with amiodarone and dronedarone by employing data mining methods on the U.S.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: This study investigated drug-drug interactions in patients with atrial fibrillation taking both a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and an antiarrhythmic drug.
Methods And Results: Using data from the National Health Insurance database (2012-2018), we identified 78 805 patients with atrial fibrillation on DOACs, with 24 142 taking amiodarone, 8631 taking propafenone, 2784 taking dronedarone, 297 taking flecainide, 177 taking sotalol, and 42 772 on DOACs alone. Patients with bradycardia, heart block, heart failure, mitral stenosis, prosthetic valves, or incomplete data were excluded.
Design and rationale of a pragmatic randomized clinical trial of early dronedarone versus usual care to change and improve outcomes in persons with first-detected atrial fibrillation - the CHANGE AFIB study.
Am Heart J
January 2025
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC; Duke Heart Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC. Electronic address:
Background: While there are several completed clinical trials that address treatment strategies in patients with symptomatic and recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF), there are no randomized clinical trials that address first-line rhythm control of new-onset AF. Recent data suggest that early initiation of rhythm control within 1 year can improve outcomes.
Methods: In this open-label pragmatic clinical trial nested within the Get with The Guidelines Atrial Fibrillation registry, approximately 3,000 patients with first-detected AF will be enrolled at approximately 200 sites.
Dronedarone hydrochloride (DH) induces pancreatic cancer cell death by triggering mtDNA-mediated pyroptosis.
Cell Death Dis
October 2024
Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital (Southwest Hospital), Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China.
Pancreatic cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-associated mortality, with a poor treatment approach. Previous study has shown that inducing pyroptosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) slows the growth of PDACs, implying that pyroptosis inducers are potentially effective for PDAC therapy. Here, we found that Dronedarone hydrochloride (DH), an antiarrhythmic drug, induces pyroptosis in pancreatic cancer cells and inhibits PDAC development in mice.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDronedarone inhibits the proliferation of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma through the CDK4/CDK6-RB1 axis in vitro and in vivo.
Front Med
October 2024
The Pathophysiology Department, School of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.
Treatment options for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) often result in poor prognosis and declining health-related quality of life. Screening FDA-approved drugs for cancer chemoprevention is a promising and cost-efficient strategy. Here, we found that dronedarone, an antiarrhythmic drug, could inhibit the proliferation of ESCC cells.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!