The sequence of Orgnac 3 in southern Europe is dated to MIS 9 and the beginning of MIS 8. The site contains records of Upper Acheulian occupations with evidence of Middle Palaeolithic technological strategies at the top of the sequence. In order to address the question of gradual versus punctuated changes in the onset of the Middle Palaeolithic, nine criteria on subsistence strategies and technological behaviour were selected throughout the whole stratigraphic sequence to describe behavioural patterns. Results indicate a mosaic of changes in hominin subsistence and technical behaviour and attest to both gradual and punctuated changes over time. For the most part, they cannot be explained by environmental factors such as site formation processes or climatic transitions. Thus, behavioural change at Orgnac 3 may be interpreted as 'multifaceted,' with a combination of gradual and punctuated shifts by hominins inhabiting the area. Orgnac 3 may be considered as a 'key-site' for understanding the basis of the Neanderthal material world and possibly the onset of clearly differentiated traditions in Neanderthal populations.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2012.08.001 | DOI Listing |
Sci Rep
January 2025
Senckenberg Centre for Human Evolution and Palaeoenvironment, University of Tübingen, 72070, Tübingen, Germany.
Lithic artefacts provide the principal means to study cultural change in the deep human past. Tools and cores have been the focus of much prior research based on their perceived information content and cultural relevance. Unretouched flakes rarely attract comparable attention in archaeological studies, despite being the most abundant assemblage elements and featuring prominently in ethnographic and experimental work.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Paleolit Archaeol
January 2025
Human Origins Research Unit, Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 2, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Unlabelled: The Châtelperronian and Uluzzian techno-complexes are identified in western Europe in the same stratigraphic position, between the late Middle Palaeolithic and other Upper Palaeolithic assemblages. Both industries include retouched artefacts with abrupt retouch and arched backs, and radiometric dating indicates that these two technocomplexes belong to the same window of time. Here, we provide a detailed, qualitative technological comparison of two Châtelperronian and two Uluzzian lithic assemblages based on a collaborative, first-hand examination of these collections.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPLoS One
November 2024
Department of Archaeology and Cultural History, NTNU Vitenskapsmuseet, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Sci Rep
October 2024
Senckenberg Centre for Human Evolution and Palaeoenvironment at the University of Tübingen, Hölderlinstrasse 23, 72070, Tübingen, Germany.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!