Background: The safety and usefulness of the SILS-TAPP (transabdominal pre-peritoneal) procedure remain unclear. The aim of this study was to clarify the safety and usefulness of the SILS-TAPP procedure compared with standard laparoscopic TAPP and TEPP (totally extra-peritoneal pre-peritoneal) procedures.

Patients And Methods: 85 patients underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs (TEPP, 30 patients; TAPP, 20 patients; SILS-TAPP, 35 patients) from 2007 to 2011. The operative outcomes of the three groups were compared.

Results: There was no difference in the patients' characteristics among the three groups. The TEPP Group had a longer operation time. One patient in the SILS-TAPP group had an intraoperative complication. One patient in the TAPP group had a postoperative complication, and one patient had ileus and one had an umbilical hernia in the SILS-TAPP group. The postoperative hospital stay was not significantly different among the three groups. There were no recurrences in the TEPP group, 1 case of recurrence (5.0%) in the TAPP group, and 1 case (2.9%) in the SILS-TAPP group.

Conclusions: The present findings show that the SILS-TAPP repair is safe and feasible for the repair of adult inguinal hernia.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2152/jmi.59.235DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

inguinal hernia
12
three groups
12
transabdominal pre-peritoneal
8
safety sils-tapp
8
tepp group
8
sils-tapp group
8
complication patient
8
tapp group
8
group postoperative
8
group case
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!