A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[Clinical study on topical bismuth subgallate/borneol (Suile) dressing for treatment of diabetic foot ulcers]. | LitMetric

[Clinical study on topical bismuth subgallate/borneol (Suile) dressing for treatment of diabetic foot ulcers].

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi

Diabetic Foot Care Center, Department of Endocrinology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan 610041, PR China.

Published: August 2012

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Bismuth Subgallate/Borneol (Suile) (BSB) dressing in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.

Methods: A two-center, randomized controlled parallel-group comparison study was conducted. Between September 2005 and November 2006, 35 patients with nonhealing diabetic foot ulcer (Wagner 2-3 grade) were recruited and divided randomly into the test group (BSB group, n = 25) and control group (IG group, n = 10). There was no significant difference in general data between 2 groups (P > 0.05). Based on the comprehensive therapy of diabetic foot, ulcers were topically treated by Suile dressing and Intrasite gel in the BSB group and IG group, respectively. The ulcer area was measured once a week. Ulcer bleeding was observed and acceptance of the dressing was inquired each week.

Results: Of the patients, 22 patients in the BSB group and 8 in the IG group completed the clinical trial. Intention to treat (ITT) analysis indicated that the results were excellent in 19 (76%) cases, good in 3 cases (12%), fair in 1 case (4%), and poor in 2 cases (8%) in the BSB group. In the IG group, the results were excellent in 8 cases (80%) cases, fair in 1 case (10%), and poor in 1 case (10%). Per-protocol (PP) analysis showed that the results were excellent in 19 cases (86%) and good in 3 cases (14%) in the BSB group, and were excellent in 8 cases (100%) in the IG group. The results of ITT and PP analysis all showed no significant difference between 2 groups (P > 0.05). The change trend of ulcer areas in the BSB group was similar to that in the IG group. There was no significant difference in the hemostatic effect between 2 groups (P > 0.05) and the patients were more likely to accept BSB dressings.

Conclusion: BSB dressings is an effective, safe, and generally well-tolerated therapy dressing in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bsb group
24
diabetic foot
20
group group
20
group
14
dressing treatment
12
treatment diabetic
12
groups 005
12
excellent cases
12
bsb
9
bismuth subgallate/borneol
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!