Fracture Resistance of Composite Fixed Partial Dentures Reinforced with Pre-impregnated and Non-impregnated Fibers.

J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects

Torabinejad Dental Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran ; Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Published: September 2012

Background And Aims: The mechanical properties of fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures (FPDs) are af-fected by fiber impregnation. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the fracture resistance of composite fixed partialdentures reinforced with pre-impregnated and non-impregnated fibers.

Materials And Methods: Groups (n=5) of three-unit fiber-reinforced composite FPDs (23 mm in length) from maxillary second premolar to maxillary second molar were fabricated on two abutments with pontic width of 12 mm. One group was fabricated as the control group with composite (Gradia) and the other two groups were fabricated with composite (Gradia) reinforced with pre-impregnated fiber (Fibrex ribbon) and non-impregnated fiber (Fiber braid), respectively. The specimens were stored in distilled water for one week at 37°C and then tested in a universal testing machine by means of a three-point bending test. Statistical analysis consisted of one-way ANOVA and a post hoc Scheffé's test for the test groups (α=0.05).

Results: Fracture resistance (N) differed significantly between the control group and the other two groups (P<0.001), but there were no statistically significant differences between the pre-impregnated and non-impregnated groups (P=0.565). The degree of deflection measured (mm) did not differ significantly between the three groups (P=0.397), yet the mean deflection measured in pre-impregnated group was twice as that in the other two groups.

Conclusion: Reinforcement of composite with fiber might considerably increase the fracture resistance of FPDs; how-ever, the type of the fiber used resulted in no significant difference in fracture resistance of FPD specimens.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3442441PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2012.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fracture resistance
12
composite fixed
12
reinforced pre-impregnated
12
resistance composite
8
fixed partial
8
partial dentures
8
pre-impregnated non-impregnated
8
fiber-reinforced composite
8
maxillary second
8
control group
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the fracture resistance of long-span fixed provisional restorations fabricated using milling, three-dimensional (3D) printing, and conventional methods.

Materials And Methods: Sixty specimens were prepared, divided into four groups of 15 each, corresponding to four fabrication methods: computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) milled provisional resins, 3D-printed provisional resins, 3D-printed permanent resins, and conventional bis-acryl restorations reinforced with wire. The specimens underwent a three-point bending test using a universal testing machine to measure fracture resistance, quantified as maximum force (in Newtons).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To investigate the association between the cumulative exposure to triglyceride-glucose index (cumTyG index) and fragility fractures in the general population.

Methods: This prospective cohort study analyzed active and retired employees of Kailuan Group who participated in three consecutive health examinations in 2006, 2008 and 2010, and were followed up until 31st December 2022. The cohort comprised 55,824 participants who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were grouped using the cumTyG index quartiles.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Forearm, wrist, and hand impairments affect many individuals and impose a significant economic burden on health care systems. The FEPSim (flexion, extension, pronation, and supination) is designed for hand and wrist rehabilitation. It could become part of the standard care for upper extremity rehabilitation, aiming to improve range of motion, dexterity, and strength during therapeutic activities.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Posterior Ligamentous Complex: Anatomic and Biomechanical Considerations in Injury Classification and Management.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg

January 2025

From the Department of Orthopaedics (A. Mo and F. Mo), Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (S. Lockey), University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.

The posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) provides critical structural support in the thoracolumbar spine. Its role in resisting progressive flexion is particularly important at the thoracolumbar junction due to the transition from the rigid thoracic spine to the more mobile lumbar region. Each component of the PLC contains anatomic features that contribute to both the structure and function of the PLC as a whole.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background/purpose: It remains unclear how the thickness and number of pulp-chamber lateral walls (PCLWs) affects fracture resistance in endocrown-restored teeth.

Materials And Methods: 64 mandibular molars were collected and randomly divided into eight groups (n = 8). In group C (control group), the teeth were untreated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!