A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Good test-retest reproducibility for an instrument to capture self-reported melanoma risk factors. | LitMetric

Good test-retest reproducibility for an instrument to capture self-reported melanoma risk factors.

J Clin Epidemiol

Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 119 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Queensland, 4102, Australia.

Published: December 2012

Objective: To examine the test-retest reliability and validity of self-reported items capturing phenotypic characteristics and sun exposure measures in the baseline survey instrument used for a prospective study of skin cancer and melanoma.

Study Design And Setting: Repeatability/validity study conducted among 114 participants randomly selected from the cohort to complete the survey instrument a second time and to undergo a physician skin examination. We calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and kappa (κ) statistics as measures of agreement for continuous and categorical measures, respectively.

Results: Measures of phenotypic characteristics showed moderate-to-high agreement (e.g., eye color, κ=0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.80, 0.94). Measures of sun exposure had slightly lower estimates of agreement. The repeatability of items relating to medical and family history of skin cancer was high (e.g., the number of skin cancers removed surgically, κ(w)=0.79; 95% CI: 0.71, 0.88). Physician counts of nevi correlated well with categorical measures of self-reported nevus density at the age of 21 years but correlated only modestly with absolute nevus counts conducted by participants (ICC, 0.38; 95% CI: 0.19, 0.54).

Conclusion: Our survey instrument demonstrated fair-to-good test-retest reliability for most self-reported risk factors for melanoma, indicating the suitability of these items for developing risk prediction tools in the future.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.06.014DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

survey instrument
12
risk factors
8
test-retest reliability
8
phenotypic characteristics
8
sun exposure
8
skin cancer
8
categorical measures
8
measures
6
good test-retest
4
test-retest reproducibility
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!