https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=22969806&retmode=xml&tool=Litmetric&email=readroberts32@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<!DOCTYPE PubmedArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMedArticle, 1st January 2024//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/out/pubmed_240101.dtd">
<PubmedArticleSet>
<PubmedArticle><MedlineCitation Status="PubMed-not-MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">22969806</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2012</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>13</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2021</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>21</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1687-8795</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>2012</Volume><PubDate><Year>2012</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>International journal of biomaterials</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Int J Biomater</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Physicochemical Characterization and In Vivo Evaluation of Amorphous and Partially Crystalline Calcium Phosphate Coatings Fabricated on Ti-6Al-4V Implants by the Plasma Spray Method.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><StartPage>603826</StartPage><MedlinePgn>603826</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="pii" ValidYN="Y">603826</ELocationID><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1155/2012/603826</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Objective. To characterize the topographic and chemical properties of 2 bioceramic coated plateau root form implant surfaces and evaluate their histomorphometric differences at 6 and 12 weeks in vivo. Methods. Plasma sprayed hydroxyapatite (PSHA) and amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP) surfaces were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), interferometry (IFM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). Implants were placed in the radius epiphysis, and the right limb of dogs provided implants that remained for 6 weeks, and the left limb provided implants that remained 12 weeks in vivo. Thin sections were prepared for bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone-area-fraction occupancy (BAFO) measurements (evaluated by Friedman analysis P &lt; 0.05). Results. Significantly, higher S(a) (P &lt; 0.03) and S(q) (P &lt; 0.02) were observed for ACP relative to PSHA. Chemical analysis revealed significantly higher HA, calcium phosphate, and calcium pyrophosphate for the PSHA surface. BIC and BAFO measurements showed no differences between surfaces. Lamellar bone formation in close contact with implant surfaces and within the healing chambers was observed for both groups. Conclusion. Given topographical and chemical differences between PSHA and ACP surfaces, bone morphology and histomorphometric evaluated parameters showed that both surfaces were osseoconductive in plateau root form implants.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bonfante</LastName><ForeName>Estevam A</ForeName><Initials>EA</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, UNIGRANRIO University-School of Health Sciences, Rua Professor Jos&#xe9; de Souza Herdy, 1.160-25 de Agosto 25071-202, Duque de Caxias, RJ, Brazil.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Witek</LastName><ForeName>Lukasz</ForeName><Initials>L</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Tovar</LastName><ForeName>Nick</ForeName><Initials>N</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Suzuki</LastName><ForeName>Marcelo</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Marin</LastName><ForeName>Charles</ForeName><Initials>C</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Granato</LastName><ForeName>Rodrigo</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Coelho</LastName><ForeName>Paulo G</ForeName><Initials>PG</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2012</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>27</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Int J Biomater</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101519099</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1687-8787</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2012</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>5</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2012</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>4</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2012</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>13</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2012</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>13</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2012</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>13</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pmc-release"><Year>2012</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>27</Day></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22969806</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3434399</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1155/2012/603826</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Coelho PG, Kang BS, Sul YT, Albrektsson T. Classification of osseointegrated implant surfaces: materials, chemistry and topography. Trends in Biotechnology. 2010;28(4):198&#x2013;206.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20116873</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Structural influence from calcium phosphate coatings and its possible effect on enhanced bone integration. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2009;67(6):333&#x2013;340.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19722110</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2009;20(supplement 4):172&#x2013;184.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19663964</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions. The International Journal of Oral &amp; Maxillofacial Implants. 2010;25(1):63&#x2013;74.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20209188</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Coelho PG, Granjeiro JM, Romanos GE, et al. Basic research methods and current trends of dental implant surfaces. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 2009;88(2):579&#x2013;596.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18973274</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: part 1&#x2014;review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2004;17(5):536&#x2013;543.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15543910</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: part 2-review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2004;17(5):544&#x2013;564.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15543911</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Lang NP, Lindhe J. De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants: a model study in the dog. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2003;14(3):251&#x2013;262.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12755774</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Leonard G, Coelho P, Polyzois I, Stassen L, Claffey N. A study of the bone healing kinetics of plateau versus screw root design titanium dental implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2009;20(3):232&#x2013;239.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19397634</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Coelho PG, Suzuki M, Guimaraes MV, et al. Early bone healing around different implant bulk designs and surgical techniques: a study in dogs. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2010;12(3):202&#x2013;208.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19438947</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Coelho PG, Granato R, Marin C, et al. The effect of different implant macrogeometries and surface treatment in early biomechanical fixation: an experimental study in dogs. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 2011;4(8):1974&#x2013;1981.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22098896</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Marin C, Granato R, Suzuki M, Gil JN, Janal MN, Coelho PG. Histomorphologic and histomorphometric evaluation of various endosseous implant healing chamber configurations at early implantation times: a study in dogs. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2010;21(6):577&#x2013;583.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20105196</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Coelho PG, Granato R, Marin C, Bonfante EA, Janal MN, Suzuki M. Biomechanical and bone histomorphologic evaluation of four surfaces on plateau root form implants: an experimental study in dogs. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology. 2010;109(5):e39&#x2013;e45.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20416517</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Granato R, Marin C, Suzuki M, Gil JN, Janal MN, Coelho PG. Biomechanical and histomorphometric evaluation of a thin ion beam bioceramic deposition on plateau root form implants: an experimental study in dogs. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 2009;90(1):396&#x2013;403.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19107801</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Suzuki M, Calasans-Maia MD, Marin C, et al. Effect of surface modifications on early bone healing around plateau root form implants: an experimental study in rabbits. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2010;68(7):1631&#x2013;1638.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20430505</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Donath K, Breuner G. A method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissues. The Sage-Schliff (sawing and grinding) technique. Journal of Oral Pathology. 1982;11(4):318&#x2013;326.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">6809919</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Chuang SK, Cai T. Predicting clustered dental implant survival using frailty methods. Journal of Dental Research. 2006;85(12):1147&#x2013;1151.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC2443684</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17122171</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Cochran DL, Jackson JM, Bernard JP, et al. A 5-year prospective multicenter study of early loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. The International Journal of Oral &amp; Maxillofacial Implants. 2011;26(6):1324&#x2013;1332.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22167440</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Levine RA, Clem D, Beagle J, et al. Multicenter retrospective analysis of the solid-screw ITI implant for posterior single-tooth replacements. The International Journal of Oral &amp; Maxillofacial Implants. 2002;17(4):550&#x2013;556.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12182298</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Zupnik JT, Kim SW, Ravens DP, Karimbux NY, Guze KA. Factors associated with dental implant survival: a four-year retrospective analysis. Journal of Periodontology. 2011;82(10):1390&#x2013;1395.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21417587</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 1981;52(2):155&#x2013;170.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">7246093</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Gerritsen AE, Allen PF, Witter DJ, Bronkhorst EM, Creugers NHJ. Tooth loss and oral health-related quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2010;8, article 126</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC2992503</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21050499</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Bonfante EA, Granato R, Marin C, et al. Early bone healing and biomechanical fixation of dual acid-etched and as-machined implants with healing chambers: an experimental study in dogs. The International Journal of Oral &amp; Maxillofacial Implants. 2011;26(1):75&#x2013;82.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21365041</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Shibli JA, Grassi S, de Figueiredo LC, Feres M, Iezzi G, Piattelli A. Human peri-implant bone response to turned and oxidized titanium implants inserted and retrieved after 2 months. Implant Dentistry. 2007;16(3):252&#x2013;259.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17846541</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Palmquist A, Omar OM, Esposito M, Lausmaa J, Thomsen P. Titanium oral implants: surface characteristics, interface biology and clinical outcome. Journal of the Royal Society Interface. 2010;7(supplement 5):S515&#x2013;S527.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC2952179</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20591849</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces. The International Journal of Oral &amp; Maxillofacial Implants. 2000;15(3):331&#x2013;344.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10874798</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Bonfante E, Marin C, Granato R, et al. Histologic and Biomechanical Evaluation of Alumina-Blasted/Acid-Etched and Resorbable Blasting Media Surfaces. The Journal of Oral Implantology. In press.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20925518</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Marin C, Granato R, Suzuki M, et al. Biomechanical and histomorphometric analysis of etched and non-etched resorbable blasting media processed implant surfaces: an experimental study in dogs. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 2010;3(5):382&#x2013;391.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20416552</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Coelho PG, Marin C, Granato R, Giro G, Suzuki M, Bonfante EA. Biomechanical and histologic evaluation of non-washed resorbable blasting media and alumina-blasted/acid-etched surfaces. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2012;23(1):132&#x2013;135.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21435012</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Lacefield WR. Current status of ceramic coatings for dental implants. Implant Dentistry. 1998;7(4):315&#x2013;322.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10196808</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Kay JF. Calcium phosphate coatings for dental implants. Current status and future potential. Dental Clinics of North America. 1992;36(1):1&#x2013;18.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">1310648</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Lacefield WR. Hydroxyapatite coatings. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1988;523:72&#x2013;80.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">3382133</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Lemons J, Dietsh-Misch F. Biomaterials for dental implants. In: Misch CE, editor. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. St. Louis, Mo, USA: Mosby; 1999. pp. 271&#x2013;302.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ong JL, Carnes DL, Bessho K. Evaluation of titanium plasma-sprayed and plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite implants in vivo. Biomaterials. 2004;25(19):4601&#x2013;4606.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15120505</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Yang Y, Kim KH, Ong JL. A review on calcium phosphate coatings produced using a sputtering process&#x2014;an alternative to plasma spraying. Biomaterials. 2005;26(3):327&#x2013;337.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15262475</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Coelho PG, Bonfante EA, Marin C, Granato R, Giro G, Suzuki M. A human retrieval study of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite-coated plateau root form implants after 2 months to 13 years in function. Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants. 2010;20(4):335&#x2013;342.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21488826</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Coelho PG, Marin C, Granato R, Suzuki M. Histomorphologic analysis of 30 plateau root form implants retrieved after 8 to 13 years in function. A human retrieval study. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 2009;91(2):975&#x2013;979.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19582841</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Munir G, Huang J, Edirisinghe M, Nangrejo R, Bonfield W. Electrohydrodynamic processing of calcium phosphates: coating and patterning for medical implants. Nano LIFE. 2012;2:1&#x2013;17.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Rasekh M, Ahmad Z, Day R, Wickam A, Edirisinghe M. Direct writing of polycaprolactone polymer for potential biomedical engineering applications. Advanced Engineering Materials. 2011;13(9):B296&#x2013;B305.</Citation></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></PubmedArticle></PubmedArticleSet>