I-SceI-based assays to examine distinct repair outcomes of mammalian chromosomal double strand breaks.

Methods Mol Biol

Department of Cancer Biology, Irell and Nanella Graduate School of Biological Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA.

Published: January 2013

Chromosomal double strand breaks (DSBs) can be repaired by a number of mechanisms that result in diverse genetic outcomes. To examine distinct outcomes of chromosomal DSB repair, a panel of human cell lines has been developed that contain GFP-based reporters with recognition sites for the rare-cutting endonuclease I-SceI. One set of reporters is used to measure DSB repair events that require access to homology: homology-directed repair, homology-directed repair that requires the removal of a nonhomologous insertion, single strand annealing, and alternative end joining. An additional reporter (EJ5-GFP) is used to measure end joining (EJ) between distal DSB ends of two tandem I-SceI sites. These Distal-EJ events do not require access to homology, and thus are distinct from the repair events described above. Indeed, this assay provides a measure of DSB end protection during EJ, via physical analysis of Distal-EJ products to determine the frequency of I-SceI-restoration. The EJ5-GFP reporter can also be adapted to examine EJ of non-cohesive DSB ends, using co-expression of I-SceI with a non-processive 3' exonuclease (Trex2), which can cause partial degradation of the 4 nucleotide 3' cohesive overhangs generated by I-SceI. Such co-expression of I-SceI and Trex2 leads to measurable I-SceI-resistant EJ products that use proximal DSB ends (Proximal-EJ), as well as distal DSB ends (Distal-EJ). Therefore, this co-expression approach can be used to examine the relative frequency of Proximal-EJ versus Distal-EJ, and hence provide a measure of the fidelity of end utilization during repair of multiple DSBs. In this report, the repair outcomes examined by each reporter are described, along with methods for cell culture, transient expression of I-SceI and Trex2, and repair product analysis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-998-3_27DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dsb ends
16
repair
9
examine distinct
8
distinct repair
8
repair outcomes
8
chromosomal double
8
double strand
8
strand breaks
8
dsb repair
8
measure dsb
8

Similar Publications

LINE-1 (L1) retrotransposition is widespread in many cancers, especially those with a high burden of chromosomal rearrangements. However, whether and to what degree L1 activity directly impacts genome integrity is unclear. Here, we apply whole-genome sequencing to experimental models of L1 expression to comprehensively define the spectrum of genomic changes caused by L1.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The CRISPR/Cas technology of targeted genome editing made it possible to carry out genetic engineering manipulations with eukaryotic genomes with a high efficiency. Targeted induction of site-specific DNA breaks is one of the key stages of the technology. The cell repairs the breaks via one of the two pathways, nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) and homology-driven repair (HDR).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Role of Microhomology-Mediated End Joining (MMEJ) at Dysfunctional Telomeres.

Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol

November 2024

Molecular Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA

DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair pathways are crucial for maintaining genome stability and cell viability. However, these pathways can mistakenly recognize chromosome ends as DNA breaks, leading to adverse outcomes such as telomere fusions and malignant transformation. The shelterin complex protects telomeres from activation of DNA repair pathways by inhibiting nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), homologous recombination (HR), and microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cohesin complex oligomerization maintains end-tethering at DNA double-strand breaks.

Nat Cell Biol

October 2024

UMR Stabilité Génétique Cellules Souches et Radiations, Université Paris Cité, INSERM, CEA, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) must be repaired to ensure genome stability. Crucially, DSB-ends must be kept together for timely repair. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, two pathways mediate DSB end-tethering.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The SMC protein family, including cohesin and condensin I/II, plays a pivotal role in maintaining the topological structure of chromosomes and influences many cellular processes, notably the repair of double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs). The cohesin complex impacts DSB repair by spreading γH2AX signal and containing DNA ends in close proximity by loop extrusion. Cohesin supports DNA stability by sister chromatid cohesion during the S/G2 phase, which limits DNA end mobility.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!