Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Size of primary tumor has implications for staging, imaging, and treatment of pancreatic head carcinomas. Limited data suggest that small tumor size is associated with better survival. The objective of this population study is to analyze characteristics and survival of patients with resected pancreatic head ductal carcinomas sized <1 and 2 cm.
Methods: Analysis of resected invasive pancreatic head ductal carcinomas captured within SEER Program from 1998 to 2008.
Results: A total of 7,135 cases were analyzed with nodal metastases in 31, 55, and 67 % for subcentimeter, 1.1-2 cm, and >2 cm tumors, respectively. Median survival was longest for node-negative tumors (38, 26, 19 months for tumors measuring ≤ 1, 1.1-2, and >2 cm, respectively; p < 0.001) versus node-positive tumors (18, 19, 14 months, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, large tumor size was associated with higher risk of death (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.179 for tumors 1.1-2 cm, p = 0.152; HR = 1.665 for tumors >2 cm, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Small pancreatic cancers have a poor prognosis and surprisingly high rate of nodal involvement; therefore, they cannot be considered early cancers. Size-based screening is unlikely to save lives with current treatment options.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2621-y | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!