Background: The American Board of Surgery (ABS) Qualifying Examination (QE) represents an important step along the pathway to board certification. We investigated whether candidates who delayed taking the QE had worse performance on the examination.
Methods: QE pass rates and equated scaled scores for all first-time examinees from 2006 to 2010 (n = 5,193) were reviewed. After eliminating examinees who could not be matched to final ABS In-Training Examination (ABSITE) scores, the remaining cohort (n = 4,909) was analyzed by comparing those who took the exam immediately after residency (Immediate, n = 4,488) to those who delayed for 1 or more years (Delay, n = 421).
Results: The Immediate group had a mean first-time QE pass rate of 87% compared to 57% for those who delayed 1 year and 48% for those who delayed 2 or more years (P < .001). Regression analysis demonstrated that delay in taking the QE remained a significant determinant of exam failure after controlling for ABSITE scores (odds ratio = 0.35; 95% CI, 0.29-0.43; P = .001). Undergraduate medical education and postresidency training did not affect the results. The Delay group had lower equated scaled scores, a greater ultimate failure rate on the QE, and was more likely to fail the ABS Certifying Examination on the first attempt.
Conclusion: These results demonstrate that candidates who delayed taking the QE immediately are at extremely high risk for exam failure and failure to achieve board certification. These findings presumably are due to deterioration of knowledge over time, but they also may represent characteristics of the Delay group that are currently undefined.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2012.07.001 | DOI Listing |
J Phys Ther Educ
January 2025
John J. DeWitt is the associate director, education and professional development and associate clinical professor in the Rehab Services at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, and School of Health & Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 453 W 10th Ave, Rm 516, Columbus, OH 43210 Please address all correspondence to John J. DeWitt.
Introduction: Emerging evidence shows positive impact of postprofessional physical therapy education (residency and fellowship) specific to participants; however, outcomes on organizational impact are largely unknown. The purpose of this project was to describe the impact residency and fellowship training has on financial metrics. A secondary purpose of this case study was to describe trends associated with higher productivity.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAlzheimer Dis Assoc Disord
January 2025
Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Objectives: Many individuals with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) die of disease-related complications, but predicting the end of life can be challenging. We identified a phenotype associated with approaching end of life.
Methods: We present 4 exemplar cases where individuals with DLB experienced refractory psychosis before death.
Unlabelled: Transparent and accurate reporting in early phase dose-finding (EPDF) clinical trials is crucial for informing subsequent larger trials. The SPIRIT statement, designed for trial protocol content, does not adequately cover the distinctive features of EPDF trials. Recent findings indicate that the protocol contents in past EPDF trials frequently lacked completeness and clarity.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUnlabelled: Early phase dose-finding (EPDF) trials are key in the development of novel therapies, with their findings directly informing subsequent clinical development phases and providing valuable insights for reverse translation. Comprehensive and transparent reporting of these studies is critical for their accurate and critical interpretation, which may improve and expedite therapeutic development. However, quality of reporting of design characteristics and results from EPDF trials is often variable and incomplete.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Heart Failure (HF) quality of care (QoC) is associated with clinical outcomes. Therefore, we investigated differences in HF QoC across worldwide regions (with differing national income) and the association of quality indicators with outcomes.
Methods: We examined the quality of care (QoC) in acute heart failure (HF) patients across different regions using quality indicators (QIs) from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) to evaluate QoC.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!