This study aimed at comparing maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2max)), maximal heart rate (HR(max)), and anaerobic threshold (AT) obtained from tethered swimming (SW) and three other testing procedures: cycling (CY), running (RU), and arm cranking (AC). Variables were assessed in 12 trained male swimmers by a portable gas analyzer connected to a modified snorkel system to allow expired gases collection during swimming. Athletes exhibited a higher VO(2max) during the SW test as compared to the CY and the AC tests. There was no significant difference in VO(2max) between the SW and the RU test, but the Bland and Altman plot highlighted a poor agreement between results. Moreover, AT occurred at higher workloads during SW in comparison to the other tests. These results do not support the use of any unspecific testing procedures to estimate VO(2max), HR(max), and AT for swimming.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10717671PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12576-012-0226-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tethered swimming
8
testing procedures
8
vo2max test
8
assessment specificity
4
specificity cardiopulmonary
4
cardiopulmonary response
4
response tethered
4
swimming
4
swimming snorkel
4
snorkel device
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!