Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Carbon dioxide digital subtraction angiography (CO(2)DSA) is a useful and safe alternative for patients with renal dysfunction or allergies to iodinated contrast medium. However, CO(2)DSA image quality is worse than that of angiography with iodinated contrast medium, primarily because of movement during imaging and stent struts. In angioplasty of arteries of the lower extremities, CO(2)DSA cannot be used to sufficiently evaluate target lesions and determine the most efficient intervention. However, in the current case report, we describe a patient with severe allergies to iodinated contrast medium (Stevens-Johnson syndrome), because of which we were unable to use any iodinated contrast medium when conducting angioplasty. Therefore, we used intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), which facilitated the complete observation of the target lesion after stent implantation without requiring iodinated contrast medium. In this case, IVUS was used to complement the diagnostic capabilities of CO(2)DSA.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.24577 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!