Theoretical consideration of selective enrichment in in vitro selection: optimal concentration of target molecules.

Math Biosci

Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Saitama University, 255 Shimo-okubo, Saitama 338-8570, Japan.

Published: December 2012

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study explores an in vitro selection system using a peptide-ligand library and a target protein receptor, focusing on maximizing selection efficiency.
  • It discusses binding probabilities of ligands to the target receptor versus non-target materials and emphasizes the importance of setting target concentrations ([R]) for optimal enrichment of the highest affinity ligand.
  • The conclusion outlines specific strategies for determining [R] based on library size and diversity, leading to significant increases in the proportion of the fittest ligand over multiple selection rounds, with calculated values aligning with experimental observations.

Article Abstract

We considered an in vitro selection system composed of a peptide-ligand library and a single target protein receptor, and examined effective strategies to realize maximum efficiency in selection. In the system, a ligand molecule with sequence s binds to a target receptor with probability of [R]/(K(ds)+[R]) (specific binding) or binds to non-target materials with probability of q (non-specific binding), where [R] and K(ds) represent the free target-receptor concentration at equilibrium and dissociation constant K(d) of the ligand sequence s with the receptor, respectively. Focusing on the fittest sequence with the highest affinity (represented by K(d1) ≡ min{K(ds)|s=1,2,…,M}) in the ligand library with a library size N and diversity M, we examined how the target concentration [R] should be set in each round to realize the maximum enrichment of the fittest sequence. In conclusion, when N >> M (that realizes a deterministic process), it is desirable to adopt [R]=K(d1), and when N=M (that realizes a stochastic process), [R]=[Formula in text] only in the first round (where * represents the population average) and [R]=K(d1) in the subsequent rounds. Based on this strategy, the mole fraction of the fittest increases by (2q)(-r) times after the rth round. With realistic parameters, we calculated several quantities such as the optimal [R] values and number of rounds needed. These values were quite reasonable and consistent with observations, suggesting the validity of our theory.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2012.07.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

vitro selection
8
selection system
8
realize maximum
8
fittest sequence
8
theoretical consideration
4
consideration selective
4
selective enrichment
4
enrichment vitro
4
selection optimal
4
optimal concentration
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!