Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of Puerarin Injection treatment on angina pectoris.
Methods: 388 patients with angina pectoris, enrolled to Tianjin Fourth Central Hospital during January 2009 and February 2011 were selected and randomly divided into treatment or control groups with 194 patients of each. Based on the conventional therapy program, one group was given Puerarin Injection as treatment group while, the other was given with Danshen Injection as control group. Clinical efficacy, the attack rate of angina pectoris, oxygen consumption, indices on electrocardiogram, haemorheology and other adverse reactions among the two groups were compared.
Results: The total efficacy of the treatment group (88.14%, 171/194) was significantly higher than the control group (61.86%, 120/194) and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). During the treatment, no significant adverse events were noticed in both of the two groups of patients.
Conclusion: The Puerarin Injection treatment program on angina pectoris seemed effective and safe.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!