HPB Surgical Unit, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS, UK.
Published: October 2012
AI Article Synopsis
Article Abstract
Background: Microscopic tumor involvement (R1) in different surgical resection margins after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been debated.
Methods: Clinico-pathological data for 258 patients who underwent PD between 2001 and 2010 were retrieved from a prospective database. The rates of R1 resection in the circumferential resection margin (pancreatic transection, medial, posterior, and anterior surfaces) and their prognostic influence on survival were assessed.
Results: For PDAC, the R1 rate was 57.1% (48/84) for any margin, 31.0% (26/84) for anterior surface, 42.9% (36/84) for posterior surface, 29.8% (25/84) for medial margin, and 7.1% (3/84) for pancreatic transection margin. Overall and disease-free survival for R1 resections were significantly worse than those for R0 resection (17.2 vs. 28.7 months, P = 0.007 and 12.3 vs. 21.0 months, P = 0.019, respectively). For individual margins, only medial positivity had a significant impact on survival (13.8 vs. 28.0 months, P < 0.001), as opposed to involvement in the anterior (19.7 vs. 23.3 months, P = 0.187) or posterior margin (17.5 vs. 24.2 months, P = 0.104). Multivariate analysis demonstrated R0 medial margin was an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.002, HR = 0.381; 95% CI 0.207-0.701).
Conclusion: The medial surgical resection margin is the most important after PD for PDAC, and an R1 resection here predicts poor survival.
Department of Pathology & Translational Genomics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Center of Companion Diagnostics, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address:
In early gastric cancer, local recurrence develops after endoscopic resection by field cancerization. Understanding the nature of cancer-prone environments is important to establish effective strategies to prevent recurrence. We hypothesized that the molecular/immune profiles in non-tumor (cancer-prone) tissue differ according to the relative distance from the gastric tumor.
Intraoperative frozen section (FS) examination of oncologic surgical specimens is frequently performed to ensure complete surgical resection. Data on the gross evaluation of surgical margins are limited. We recently published a study suggesting the use of a macroscopic 2.
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) frequently metastasizes to the liver, significantly worsening patient outcomes. While hepatectomy offers the best curative option for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), margin recurrence remains a major challenge post-surgery. Intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) aids tumor identification and margin determination, but its limitations in laparoscopic surgery necessitate additional methods.
Background: Reduced-port laparoscopic surgery (RPLS) uses the minimum possible number of ports or small-sized ports in laparoscopic surgery. The combination of RPLS and natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) minimizes the procedural damage.
Methods: A total of 17 patients diagnosed with right colon cancer were included: 5 patients in the RPLS + NOSE group and 12 patients in the conventional laparoscopic surgery (CL) + mini-laparotomy (ML) group.
Background: Minimally invasive approaches for rectal cancer treatment are emerging as the standard of care. Robotic surgery is unfeasible across the country due to constrained resource allocation. This study aimed to assess the oncologic efficacy of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer in a resource-limited setting.
