Background: The economic ramifications of acute rejection (AR) are not well characterized in a contemporary population of kidney transplant recipients.
Methods: Data for Medicare-insured transplant recipients in 2000 to 2007 (n=45,250) were drawn from the United States Renal Data System. AR events were ascertained from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network reports covering months 0 to 12 (yr1), 13 to 24 (yr2), and 25 to 36 (yr3) after transplantation. AR was subclassified as antibody (Ab)-treated AR or other management (non-Ab-treated AR). The marginal cost impact of AR events during and before a period of interest was quantified by multivariate linear regression including covariates for recipient, donor, and transplant factors.
Results: Among recipients of standard criteria donor allografts, both Ab-treated AR events (yr1, $22,407; yr 2, $18,803; yr3, $13,909) and non-Ab-treated AR events (yr1, $14,122; yr2, $7852; yr3, $8234) were associated with significant increases in the cost of care. Patterns were similar among recipients of living donor and expanded criteria donor transplants. After weighting by population frequency, AR accounted for 2.3% to 3.8% of total costs incurred during 1 year of posttransplantation care. Subanalysis of recipients with yr1 estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) information demonstrated markedly stronger cost variation across eGFR levels. For example, among those with non-Ab-treated AR, adjusted total yr2 costs were $22,747 with eGFR of 60 mL/min/1.73 m or higher but $43,881 with eGFR of 30 mL/min/1.73 m or lower.
Conclusions: AR is a significant contributor to individual posttransplantation costs. However, because of its low frequency, AR accounts for a small proportion of posttransplantation costs in the population. Healthcare costs in patients with AR are markedly higher among those with reduced compared with preserved allograft function.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TP.0b013e318255f839 | DOI Listing |
Mol Med
January 2025
Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, No. 154, Anshan Road, Heping District, Tianjin, 300052, China.
Background: Acute rejection (AR) is one of the significant factors contributing to poor prognosis in patients following kidney transplantation. Neutrophils are the main cause of early host-induced tissue injury. This paper intends to investigate the possible mechanisms of neutrophil involvement in acute rejection in renal transplantation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Transplant
January 2025
Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan; Department of Urology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan. Electronic address:
Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) remains a leading cause of graft loss during kidney transplantation. Ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) has been reported to promote T-cell proliferation, leading to B-cell activation and subsequent production of donor-specific antibodies (DSA), which target antigens on the vascular endothelium. We hypothesize that a novel therapeutic strategy targeting highly toxic reactive oxygen species could mitigate oxidative stress and immune responses associated with IRI.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRev Med Suisse
January 2025
Service de néphrologie, Département de médecine, Hôpitaux universitaires de Genève, Genève 14.
Certain molecules, such as GLP-1 agonists and endothelin antagonists, possess nephroprotective properties. When treating IgA nephropathy, endothelin antagonists and sibeprenlimab have shown effectiveness in slowing the progression of chronic kidney isease. Additionally, the infusion of amino acids can reduce the incidence of mild acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSurg Pract Sci
March 2024
Department of Surgery, Division of Multiorgan Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX, 77555-0655, USA.
Introduction: In renal transplantation, donor hepatitis C virus (HCV) status is crucial to consider when selecting a recipient given the high likelihood of transmission. We analyzed the effect of donor HCV status on post-renal transplant rejection and virologic infectious outcomes using electronic health record data from multiple US health care organizations.
Methods: Using real world data from electronic health records of renal transplant recipients, a propensity score-matched case-control study of one-year renal transplant outcomes was conducted on cohorts of HCV-negative recipients who received an organ from an HCV-positive donor (HCV D+/R-) versus from an HCV-negative donor (HCV D-/R-).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!