Complications and management of an implanted intraperitoneal access port system for intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis.

Jpn J Clin Oncol

Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, and Department of Outpatient Chemotherapy, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.

Published: November 2012

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examined the safety and effectiveness of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis and highlighted the importance of managing access ports.
  • A total of 131 patients received the treatment, with 20.6% experiencing complications mainly due to inflow obstruction and infection, though these issues did not affect overall survival rates.
  • The findings indicate that while complications can occur, intraperitoneal chemotherapy remains a viable option for patients when managed correctly.

Article Abstract

Objective: The efficacy of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis has been verified by clinical trials. To perform intraperitoneal chemotherapy safely and effectively, the appropriate management of intraperitoneal access ports is essential. The aim of this study was to investigate the occurrence of port complications during cyclically repeated intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Methods: The medical records of 131 gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastases who received intraperitoneal paclitaxel between 2005 and 2011 were retrospectively analyzed.

Results: The median period of intraperitoneal chemotherapy using a port system was 12.9 months (range: 0.8-61.5 months), and a total of 27 (20.6%) patients experienced port complications. Inflow obstruction (7.6%) and infection (6.9%) were the main complications, followed by reflux (3.1%), subcutaneous masses (1.5%) and fistulae (1.5%). The median interval between port implantation and port complication was 5.4 months (range: 0.3-40.9 months). Complications were controllable and chemotherapy was not terminated by complications. Survival was not affected by the presence or absence of port complications (median survival time: 22.5 vs. 17.2 months, respectively; P=0.65).

Conclusions: Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer using a port is safe and feasible under appropriate management.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hys129DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intraperitoneal chemotherapy
20
gastric cancer
16
chemotherapy gastric
12
port complications
12
intraperitoneal
9
intraperitoneal access
8
port
8
port system
8
cancer peritoneal
8
peritoneal metastasis
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!