Comparison of manual and automated DNA purification for measuring TREC in dried blood spot (DBS) samples with qPCR.

J Immunol Methods

Translational Medicine Research Group, Cranfield Health, Cranfield University, Cranfield, United Kingdom.

Published: October 2012

Automated nucleic acid extractions from dried blood spot (DBS) samples promises standardized sample treatment, low error rates, avoidance of contamination and requirement of less hands-on time. In the present study, non-automated and automated column based extraction processes using the QIAamp Investigator procedure were compared for the extraction of DNA from DBS samples. The concentration and the purity of DNA generated were determined by optical density readings. Furthermore qPCR downstream applications using the nucleic acids extracted with the two processes and albumin and T-cell receptor excision circles (TREC) copy numbers were measured and compared. The influence of the time of storage was also investigated by analyzing samples freshly dried and stored up to 11weeks at -20°C from the same individual. Finally, we provide arguments of preferentially choosing the automated procedure for extracting DNAs from DBS samples when downstream qPCR applications are required.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2012.07.016DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dbs samples
16
dried blood
8
blood spot
8
spot dbs
8
samples
5
comparison manual
4
automated
4
manual automated
4
automated dna
4
dna purification
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!