Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: To establish a new optimized extraction process based on dynamic changes in extract concentration during the extraction process.
Method: Sanqi was taken as an example to compare the concentration of marker components, total solids yield and similarity evaluation of the fingerprint images of extracts by orthogonal design optimization process and dynamic optimization process to assess the feasibility of dynamic process optimization method.
Result: The concentration of marker components and total solids yield vary less than 5%, with a 100% of similarity in fingerprints, indicating basic coincidence between extracts by the two optimized processes. The dynamic process optimization process could save 79% of the extraction time.
Conclusion: In the extraction time, the dynamic optimization process is superior to the orthogonal design optimization process in that it can significantly reduce the extraction time and lower production costs.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!