AI Article Synopsis

  • The study explored the benefits of using CO2 instead of air for insufflation during colonoscopy with esophagogastroduodenoscopy (CCEGD) in moderately sedated patients.
  • A total of 96 outpatients participated, with findings indicating that those using CO2 experienced significantly less pain immediately after the procedure compared to those using air.
  • The results showed CO2 insufflation led to less abdominal pain and distension, making it a more comfortable and safe option for patients undergoing CCEGD.

Article Abstract

Goals And Background: Colonoscopy with consecutive esophagogastroduodenoscopy (CCEGD) can be more convenient than performing each procedure individually. There has been no randomized controlled trial comparing carbon dioxide (CO2) versus air insufflations during CCEGD in sedated patients. CO2 insufflation instead of air during CCEGD may reduce abdominal pain and be more comfortable. We investigated the efficacy and safety of CO2 insufflation during CCEGD in moderately sedated outpatients.

Study: This was a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. A total of 96 outpatients were randomly assigned to the groups of CO2 or air insufflation. Postprocedure pain was assessed using a 0 to 10 visual analogue scale, and the proportion of pain-free patients was compared between the groups. Waist circumferences and end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) were measured.

Results: Among 96 patients, cecal intubation failed in 2 patients, who were excluded from the analysis. Forty-eight patients in the CO2 and 46 patients in the air group completed the study. There was significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the proportion of pain-free patients 30 minutes after the procedures [air group, 35/46 (76.1%) vs. CO2 group, 44/48 (91.6%)] (P=0.03). However, there was no significant difference in the proportion at 6 and 24 hours after the procedures. The mean increase in waist circumference was greater with air than with CO2 (1.54 vs. 0.18 cm, P<0.001). The ETCO2 measured immediately after the procedures was slightly higher in the CO2 group than in the air group (38.6 vs. 37.2 mm Hg, P=0.02), but the values were within the normal range. No significant adverse events occurred.

Conclusions: CO2 insufflation during CCEGD reduced postprocedural pain and distension compared with air. It was comfortable and safe to use in moderately sedated outpatients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0b013e31825c023aDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

controlled trial
12
efficacy safety
8
carbon dioxide
8
colonoscopy consecutive
8
consecutive esophagogastroduodenoscopy
8
moderately sedated
8
randomized double-blind
8
double-blind controlled
8
co2
8
patients co2
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!