A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The effect of amifostine on submandibular gland histology after radiation. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate how amifostine affects the histology of submandibular glands in patients undergoing chemoradiation for head and neck cancer.
  • Researchers performed a retrospective analysis on histologic slides from these patients, assessing factors like fatty replacement and inflammation across three groups with different amifostine doses.
  • Ultimately, the results indicated that varying doses of amifostine did not demonstrate significant protective effects on gland tissue, as no significant differences were found in histological outcomes among the groups.

Article Abstract

Background. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of amifostine on submandibular gland histology in patients receiving chemoradiation therapy. Methods. We conducted a retrospective submandibular gland histologic slide review of HNSCC patients receiving chemoradiation for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with three different levels of amifostine exposure. We used six scoring parameters: fatty replacement, lobular architecture degeneration, interstitial fibrosis, ductal degeneration, acinar degeneration, and inflammatory component presence. Results. Differences in gender, tumor stage, amifostine dose, age, number of days after neck dissection, and smoking history (pack years) exposure were not significant between the three groups, although there was a difference between groups in the primary subsite (P = 0.006). The nonparametric Cuzick's test for histologic parameters with varied amifostine treatment showed no significance among the three groups. Conclusions. Although patients did not receive a full dose of amifostine due to side effects, varying doses of amifostine had no apparent evident cytoprotective effects in three groups of cancer patients treated with primary chemoradiation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3403191PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/508279DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

submandibular gland
12
three groups
12
amifostine submandibular
8
gland histology
8
patients receiving
8
receiving chemoradiation
8
amifostine
7
histology radiation
4
radiation background
4
background purpose
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!