AI Article Synopsis

  • The study focused on improving the rapid identification of bacteria from positive blood cultures to help doctors provide timely treatment for bacteraemia using two methods: the MALDI Sepsityper kit and an in-house saponin lysis method.
  • Among 107 monobacterial cultures, the identification rates were 67% for the Sepsityper kit and 66% for the saponin method, with better results for Gram-negative bacteria (82.5% and 90%, respectively) compared to Gram-positive bacteria (58% and 52%).
  • While there were no misidentifications compared to traditional methods, success in identifying species from polymicrobial cultures was limited, with only one correct identification achieved regardless

Article Abstract

In cases of bacteraemia, a rapid species identification of the causal agent directly from positive blood culture broths could assist clinicians in the timely targeting of empirical antimicrobial therapy. For this purpose, we evaluated the direct identification of micro-organisms from BacT/ALERT (bioMérieux) anaerobic positive blood cultures without charcoal using the Microflex matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) time of flight MS (Bruker), after bacterial extraction by using two different methods: the MALDI Sepsityper kit (Bruker) and an in-house saponin lysis method. Bruker's recommended criteria for identification were expanded in this study, with acceptance of the species identification when the first three results with the best matches with the MALDI Biotyper database were identical, whatever the scores were. In total, 107 monobacterial cultures and six polymicrobial cultures from 77 different patients were included in this study. Among monomicrobial cultures, we identified up to the species level 67 and 66 % of bacteria with the MALDI Sepsityper kit and the saponin method, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two extraction methods. The direct species identification was particularly inconclusive for Gram-positive bacteria, as only 58 and 52 % of them were identified to the species level with the MALDI Sepsityper kit and the saponin method, respectively. Results for Gram-negative bacilli were better, with 82.5 and 90 % of correct identification to the species level with the MALDI Sepsityper kit and the saponin method, respectively. No misidentifications were given by the direct procedures when compared with identifications provided by the conventional method. Concerning the six polymicrobial blood cultures, whatever the extraction method used, a correct direct identification was only provided for one of the isolated bacteria on solid medium in all cases. The analysis of the time-to-result demonstrated a reduction in the turnaround time for identification ranging from 1 h 06 min to 24 h 44 min, when performing the blood culture direct identification in comparison with the conventional method, whatever the extraction method.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.044750-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

maldi sepsityper
20
sepsityper kit
20
direct identification
16
saponin method
16
positive blood
12
blood cultures
12
species identification
12
species level
12
kit saponin
12
method
9

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!