Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Explicitly time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) has often been suggested as the method of choice for controlling the correlated dynamics of many electron systems. However, it is not yet clear which control tasks can be achieved reliably and how this depends on the functionals used. In this article, we show that the control task of creating a simple wave packet, having a population of 50% in the excited state, can indeed be achieved if a certain condition is fulfilled. This result is in contrast to the observation that a full population inversion is extremely difficult to achieve. In addition, we identify a rule to predict when TDDFT produces the correct wave packet. To illustrate our findings, we study the molecules Li(2)C(2), Li(7)OH, and B(2)N(2)CO using two different functionals as well as time-dependent Hartree-Fock (TDHF). To assess the performance of TDDFT and TDHF, we compare with time-dependent configuration interaction calculations.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp3047483 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!