A prospective randomized study on the benefits of a new small-caliber colonoscope.

Endoscopy

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.

Published: August 2012

Background And Study Aims: We compared the performance efficiency of a newly developed small-caliber colonoscope (PCF-PQ260 L) with passive bending, high force transmission, and an outer diameter of 9.2 mm with that of a standard colonoscope, in female and male patients, particularly with regard to passage through acute angulations or into the proximal colon.

Patients And Methods: A total of 330 patients were randomly allocated to undergo small-caliber (n = 164) or standard (n = 166) colonoscopy. The patients were assessed for pain using a visual analogue scale (0 = none, 100 = extremely painful), and for cecal intubation, withdrawal time, difficulty of colonoscopy, dosage and level of sedation used, and any complications.

Results: Median maximum pain and overall pain during colonoscopy were significantly lower in the small-caliber group than in the standard group in women (25 vs. 45, P < 0.001 and 15 vs. 26, P = 0.001, respectively), whereas no significant differences were seen in men (8 vs. 10, P = 0.103 and 16 vs. 20, P = 0.166, respectively). Furthermore, no significant differences were seen between groups in cecal intubation rate or time to cecum in all patients or by sex.

Conclusions: Use of the small-caliber colonoscope reduced pain in female patients, but offered no advantage over standard colonoscopy in male patients. The performance of the small-caliber colonoscope was equivalent to that of the standard colonoscope in terms of cecal intubation rate and time to cecum, regardless of the sex of the patient.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1310063DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

small-caliber colonoscope
16
cecal intubation
12
standard colonoscope
8
male patients
8
intubation rate
8
rate time
8
time cecum
8
small-caliber
6
colonoscope
6
patients
6

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates risk factors leading to painful colonoscopies and extended cecal intubation times specifically in female patients.
  • Key findings highlight that women with sigmoid colon diverticulosis have a higher likelihood of experiencing pain during the procedure, while better tools (small-caliber colonoscopes) can reduce pain.
  • Additionally, inadequate bowel preparation is linked to longer cecal intubation times, suggesting that preparation quality is crucial for a smoother procedure.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Recently, a newly designed short-type single-balloon enteroscope (SBE), SIF-H290S, has been developed with a smaller outer diameter and a longer working length than conventional colonoscopes. It has passive bending and high-force transmission, making insertion easier. However, it is difficult to perform rescue colonoscopy with an SBE after incomplete colonoscopy in the same session.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Female patients often experience increased pain during unsedated colonoscopy, prompting this study to test a small-caliber colonoscope, PCF-PQ260 L, for pain reduction.
  • The study involved 220 women, split between the small-caliber and standard colonoscopy groups, with results showing that those using the small-caliber scope reported significantly lower overall and maximum pain scores.
  • Additionally, the small-caliber colonoscope not only improved the success rate of the procedure but also increased the likelihood of women opting for unsedated colonoscopies in the future.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Numerical evaluation of the efficacy of small-caliber colonoscopes in reducing patient pain during a colonoscopy.

Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin

January 2019

a Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering , University of Minnesota Duluth, MN , USA.

Patient pain caused by a colonoscope is one of the main complications in completing a colonoscopy. Currently, randomized controlled trial (RCT) is one of the most used methods to evaluate the efficacy of small-caliber (SC) colonoscopes in reducing patient pain during a colonoscopy, compared with a standard colonoscope (SDC). However, many disturbing factors, including endoscopists' skills, characteristics of patients and new technical features of the colonoscope (passive bending and high force transmission shaft), limit the reliability and generalizability of each finding in current RCTs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!