Recruiting research participants based on genetic information generated about them in a prior study is a potentially powerful way to study the functional significance of human genetic variation, but also presents ethical challenges. To inform policy development on this issue, we conducted a survey of U.S. institutional review board chairs concerning the acceptability of recontacting genetic research participants about additional research and their views on the disclosure of individual genetic results as part of recruitment. Our findings suggest there is unlikely to be a “one-size-fits-all” solution, but rather several ethically acceptable approaches to genotype-driven recruitment depending on context. Disclosures made during the consent process for the original study and the clinical validity of the results are key considerations. Researchers must be prepared to communicate and answer questions in clear, lay language about what is known and not known about the role of genetics in their proposed area of research.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3632007PMC

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

genotype-driven recruitment
8
irb chairs'
4
chairs' perspectives
4
perspectives genotype-driven
4
recruitment recruiting
4
recruiting participants
4
participants based
4
genetic
4
based genetic
4
genetic generated
4

Similar Publications

Genomic Landscapes and Hallmarks of Mutant RAS in Human Cancers.

Cancer Res

November 2022

Department of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Article Synopsis
  • The RAS family of GTPases, often mutated in various cancers, was analyzed across 66,372 tumors to understand how RAS mutations affect other genes and overall cancer characteristics.
  • The study revealed that RAS mutations show different patterns of co-mutations with non-RAS genes, influenced by the type of cancer, patient demographics, and genetic factors, particularly noting distinctions in KRAS G12C-mutant lung cancer.
  • Findings suggest that understanding the genomic differences in RAS-mutant tumors can help develop targeted therapies and improve clinical outcomes, especially with immunotherapy strategies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Human genomics established that pathogenic variation in diverse genes can underlie a single disorder. For example, hereditary spastic paraplegia is associated with >80 genes, with frequently only few affected individuals described for each gene. Herein, we characterize a large cohort of individuals with biallelic variation in ENTPD1, a gene previously linked to spastic paraplegia 64 (Mendelian Inheritance in Man # 615683).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Genetic counseling and diagnostic genetic testing are considered part of the multidisciplinary care of individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD). We aimed to investigate the ideal components of genetic counseling for ALS/FTD diagnostic testing amongst various stakeholders using an online, modified Delphi survey. Experts in genetic counseling and testing for ALS/FTD were purposively then snowball recruited and included genetic health professionals, health professionals outside of genetics and consumer experts (patients, relatives, and staff representatives from ALS/FTD support organizations).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Clinico-genetic findings in 509 frontotemporal dementia patients.

Mol Psychiatry

October 2021

Institut für Neurogenomik, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Gesundheit und Umwelt (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany.

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous disorder. To which extent genetic aberrations dictate clinical presentation remains elusive. We investigated the spectrum of genetic causes and assessed the genotype-driven differences in biomarker profiles, disease severity and clinical manifestation by recruiting 509 FTD patients from different centers of the German FTLD consortium where individuals were clinically assessed including biomarker analysis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The Mayo Clinic Biobank was established to provide a large group of patients from which comparison groups (ie, controls) could be selected for case-control studies, to create a prospective cohort with sufficient power for common outcomes and to support electronic health record (EHR) studies.

Participants: A total of 56 862 participants enrolled (21% response rate) into the Mayo Clinic Biobank from Rochester, Minnesota (77%, n=43 836), Jacksonville, Florida (18%, n=10 368) and La Crosse, Wisconsin (5%, n=2658). Participants were all Mayo Clinic patients, 18 years of age or older and US residents.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!