Persuading people to undertake actions to prevent skin cancer is an important public health challenge. A number of studies have compared the effectiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed appeals in this domain, often expecting gain-framed appeals to be more persuasive. A meta-analytic review (k = 33, N = 4,168), however, finds no significant difference in the persuasiveness of gain- and loss-framed appeals for encouraging skin cancer prevention. This conclusion is unaffected by differences in the specific protective action advocated or by differences in the kind of outcomes invoked. But the results offer an intimation that men might be more susceptible to framing variations in this domain--with loss-framed appeals potentially having a persuasive advantage.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3397368PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9062121DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

loss-framed appeals
16
skin cancer
12
meta-analytic review
8
gain-framed loss-framed
8
cancer prevention
8
appeals persuasive
8
appeals
5
gain-framed
4
gain-framed messages
4
messages motivate
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!