Objective: To validate a five-factor scoring system that identifies parturients who experience near-miss morbidity.

Study Design And Setting: This study was conducted in an urban, tertiary care hospital over a 2-year period. A narrative case summary was prepared for women with high potential for significant obstetric morbidity. The summary was then reviewed by three physicians, and the extent of morbidity was assigned based on subjective assessment. The same cases were then scored using the proposed five-factor scoring system previously described by Geller et al. Test characteristics of the scoring system were assessed.

Results: Eight hundred fifteen cases with a high potential for significant morbidity were identified. Subjective review and the scoring system classified 4.5% and 4.2% as near-miss morbidity, respectively, with the scoring system having a corresponding sensitivity of 81.1% (95% confidence interval 64.8 to 92.0%) and a specificity of 99.5% (95% confidence interval 98.7 to 99.9%).

Conclusion: The scoring system produced similar results to those obtained at its initial development and demonstrated acceptable sensitivity and specificity for identifying near-miss morbidity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1321493DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

scoring system
28
five-factor scoring
8
high potential
8
near-miss morbidity
8
95% confidence
8
confidence interval
8
system
7
morbidity
6
scoring
6
validation scoring
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!