A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Clinical validation of an algorithm to correct the error in the keratometric estimation of corneal power in normal eyes. | LitMetric

Clinical validation of an algorithm to correct the error in the keratometric estimation of corneal power in normal eyes.

J Cataract Refract Surg

Grupo de Óptica y Percepción Visual, Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.

Published: August 2012

Purpose: To validate clinically in a normal healthy population an algorithm to correct the error in the keratometric estimation of corneal power based on the use of a variable keratometric index of refraction (n(k)).

Setting: Medimar International Hospital (Oftalmar) and University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.

Design: Case series.

Methods: Corneal power was measured with a Scheimpflug photography-based system (Pentacam software version 1.14r01) in healthy eyes with no previous ocular surgery. In all cases, keratometric corneal power was also estimated using an adjusted value of n(k) that is dependent on the anterior corneal radius (r(1c)) as follows: n(kadj) = -0.0064286 r(1c) +1.37688. Agreement between the Gaussian (P(c)(Gauss)) and adjusted keratometric (P(kadj)) corneal power values was evaluated.

Results: The study evaluated 92 eyes (92 patients; age range 15 to 64 years). The mean difference between P(c)(Gauss) and P(kadj) was -0.02 diopter (D) ± 0.22 (SD) (P=.43). A very strong, statistically significant correlation was found between both corneal powers (r = .994, P<.01). The range of agreement between P(c)(Gauss) and P(kadj) was 0.44 D, with limits of agreement of -0.46 and +0.42 D. In addition, a very strong, statistically significant correlation of the difference between P(c)(Gauss) and P(kadj) and the posterior corneal radius was found (r = 0.96, P<.01).

Conclusion: The imprecision in the calculation of corneal power using keratometric estimation can be minimized in clinical practice by using a variable keratometric index that depends on the radius of the anterior corneal surface.

Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.03.026DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

corneal power
20
algorithm correct
8
correct error
8
error keratometric
8
keratometric estimation
8
estimation corneal
8
corneal
7
keratometric
5
power
5
clinical validation
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!