In this commentary, we argue that although randomization has many benefits, not all questions we seek to answer fit into a randomized setting. Our argument utilizes the clinical setting of carotid atherosclerosis management where specific clinical questions are answered by using a variety of comparative effectiveness designs. Observational studies should not be ruled out when designing studies to address questions of comparative effectiveness.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5048192PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.5482DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

comparative effectiveness
12
effectiveness size
4
size fit
4
fit all?
4
all? commentary
4
commentary argue
4
argue randomization
4
randomization benefits
4
benefits questions
4
questions seek
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!