AI Article Synopsis

  • The study focuses on assessing the content validity of a Swedish version of the COS-BC questionnaire, which measures psychosocial impacts of false-positive breast cancer screening results.
  • It evaluates the relevance of long-term consequences from lung cancer screenings in the context of breast cancer and highlights the useful role of previous Rasch analysis data in translation and adaptation.
  • Findings indicate strong content validity, with most items deemed relevant, leading to the final Swedish versions comprising 34 and 23 items for parts 1 and 2, respectively.

Article Abstract

Rationale: Experiencing a false-positive screening mammography can cause considerable psychosocial distress. The Consequences of Screening - Breast Cancer questionnaire (COS-BC parts 1 and 2), recently developed in Denmark, is the only condition-specific questionnaire for measuring short- and long-term psychosocial consequences of false-positive mammographic screening. Additional studies are needed to further test the COS-BC before use across cultures. Furthermore, studies have suggested that the consequences of false-positive screening results are partly common across cancer screening settings, although this hypothesis remains largely untested.

Objectives: This study (i) assesses content validity of a Swedish version of the COS-BC, (ii) tests whether items expressing long-term consequences of false-positive lung cancer screening results are relevant in a breast cancer screening context and (iii) explores the usefulness of taking results from Rasch analyses of the source version as an aid in questionnaire translation and adaptation.

Methods: Following dual-panel translation, content validity was assessed through qualitative interviews with representatives of the target population and the content validity index (CVI). Item locations and Rasch model fit of the source questionnaires were considered in the translation and assessment process.

Results: The COS-BC items were generally found relevant and provided coverage of the target construct. Content validity was supported also for nine of 10 lung cancer screening items. Scale CVI values were ≥0.81. Previous Rasch data were useful in facilitating translation and assessing item content validity. The resulting Swedish version of the COS-BC parts 1 and 2 consists of 34 and 23 items, respectively.

Conclusion: This study illustrates the value of methodological triangulation and use of data from previous Rasch analyses in questionnaire translation and adaptation. We found support for the hypothesis that consequences of false-positive screening are common across cancer screening settings. Psychometric properties of the Swedish COS-BC remain to be established.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.01035.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cancer screening
20
content validity
20
consequences false-positive
16
false-positive screening
12
screening
11
screening breast
8
breast cancer
8
cos-bc parts
8
common cancer
8
screening settings
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!